Development Intent
Case officer · Hammersmith And Fulham Planning

John White.

Active — last recorded decision Apr 2026

A case officer at Hammersmith And Fulham with an approval rate of 100% across 49 decided planning applications, spanning 10 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer49 decisions100% approvalSave
Hammersmith And Fulham · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
49
Applications
2024–26
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average

Not enough dated decisions for a trend yet.

What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate100% · 2nd of 45
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of John White's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications John White decided — 12 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

DC1Built environment quality and integrationHammersmith And Fulham plan
12 times cited
39NPPF
11 times cited
NPPFNPPF
11 times cited
DC4High standard of design for alterations and extensionsHammersmith And Fulham plan
9 times cited
HO11Detailed Residential StandardsHammersmith And Fulham plan
7 times cited
DC6Respecting architectural character with replacement windowsHammersmith And Fulham plan
6 times cited
DC8Heritage and conservation: Buildings at riskHammersmith And Fulham plan
5 times cited
CC11Noise and Vibration Control for DevelopmentsHammersmith And Fulham plan
4 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2024–26.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
P/2026/00828/HH
Householder Application
Approved
2026-05-20
2026/00173/FUL
Full Planning Application
Approved
2026-05-15
P/2026/00828/HH
Householder Application
Approved
2026-05-20
2026/00173/FUL
Full Planning Application
Approved
2026-05-15
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 49 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Mr Christopher Evans / Consul Chartered Surveyors
2. Mr Mark Finney / SEB + FIN Architects Ltd.
3. Mr Andrew Smith / FTF Designs Ltd
4. Mr Matthew Brooke / Blox Studio
At a glance
OfficerJohn White
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications49 (2024–26)
Approval rate100%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Hammersmith And Fulham planning register and published decision notices, 2024–26. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Hammersmith And Fulham decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.