Development Intent
AtlasGreenwichOfficersBrendan Meade
Planning Atlas›Greenwich›Brendan Meade
Case officer · Greenwich Planning

Brendan Meade.

Active — last recorded decision May 2026

A case officer at Greenwich with an approval rate of 62% across 552 decided planning applications, spanning 26 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer552 decisions62% approvalSave
Greenwich · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
552
Applications
2021–26
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%80%202157%202258%202369%202470%202549%2026
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compare — Versus peers
Approval rate62% · 55th of 57
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time— · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn— · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Brendan Meade's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Brendan Meade decided — 38 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

DH1DesignGreenwich plan
34 times cited
D3London Plan
30 times cited
H5Housing DesignGreenwich plan
22 times cited
DH(B)Greenwich plan
17 times cited
D6London Plan
14 times cited
IM4Sustainable TravelGreenwich plan
14 times cited
E(A)Greenwich plan
14 times cited
IM(C)Greenwich plan
13 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
84
66%
64
59%
52
62%
47
71%
45
51%
38
65%
38
50%
34
67%
22
67%
17
43%
16
75%
14
80%
13
62%
12
73%
12
64%
10
70%
7
40%
5
40%
5
67%
4
75%
3
0%
2
50%
2
100%
2
50%
1
0%
1
100%
84
66%
64
59%
52
62%
Show all 26 rows
47
71%
45
51%
38
65%
38
50%
34
67%
22
67%
17
43%
16
75%
14
80%
13
62%
12
73%
12
64%
10
70%
7
40%
5
40%
5
67%
4
75%
3
0%
2
50%
2
100%
2
50%
1
0%
1
100%

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2021–26.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
26/0097/F
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2026-06-05
26/0671/F
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2026-06-05
26/0097/F
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2026-06-05
26/0671/F
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2026-06-05
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 552 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Excel Planning
2. Redwoods Projects
3. SAM Planning services
4. Fred Richard &Associates
At a glance
OfficerBrendan Meade
BoroughGreenwich
RolePlanning officer
Experience—
Applications552 (2021–26)
Approval rate62%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Greenwich planning register and published decision notices, 2021–26. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Greenwich decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.