Development Intent
AtlasGreenwichOfficersLucas Zoricak
Case officer · Greenwich Planning

Lucas Zoricak.

Active — last recorded decision May 2026

A case officer at Greenwich with an approval rate of 65% across 438 decided planning applications, spanning 19 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer438 decisions65% approvalSave
Greenwich · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
438
Applications
2021–26
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%66%202264%202357%202471%202571%2026
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate65% · 51st of 57
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Lucas Zoricak's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Lucas Zoricak decided — 27 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

D3London Plan
24 times cited
DH1DesignGreenwich plan
23 times cited
NPPFNPPF
17 times cited
HC1London Plan
15 times cited
DH(A)Greenwich plan
15 times cited
DH(H)Greenwich plan
12 times cited
DH3Heritage AssetsGreenwich plan
11 times cited
DH(B)Greenwich plan
9 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2021–26.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
26/1133/HD
Householders
Approved
2026-06-04
26/1087/HD
Householders
Refused
2026-06-01
26/1133/HD
Householders
Approved
2026-06-04
26/1087/HD
Householders
Refused
2026-06-01
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 438 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. M.A. Newsome & Co Ltd
2. Podium Surveying LLP
3. Russell Associates Architects
4. Russell Associates Architect
At a glance
OfficerLucas Zoricak
BoroughGreenwich
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications438 (2021–26)
Approval rate65%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Greenwich planning register and published decision notices, 2021–26. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Greenwich decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.