Development Intent
Planning AtlasGreenwichPLUMSTEAD & GLYNDONApplication
Planning Application

26/0097/F

LAKEDALE POWER TOOLS, 217 -223 PLUMSTEAD HIGH STREET, PLUMSTEAD, LONDON, SE18 1HE

Full / Other PlanningPLUMSTEAD & GLYNDON wardConservation Areas
Submission
13 Jan 2026
Target
25 Mar 2026
Decision
5 Jun 2026
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
5 Jun 2026
Decided by Brendan Meade under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Change of use at basement, ground floor and first floor levels and of building at rear from commercial (Use Class E) to residential (Use Class C3) to faciliate the creation of 7 new flats and partial retention of Use Class E at ground floor, in addition to the creation of a lightwell and staircase access to basement level, shopfront alterations, provision of balconies and amenity spaces at rear, boundary treatment, provision of waste and cycle storage and all other associated alterations (Revised description)

Why it was refused
Reason 1

The proposed development, by reason of the loss of the prominent corner element and active retail frontage along Kashgar Road, would fail to maximise the commercial potential of the retained retail unit within an established neighbourhood parade. The proposal would therefore undermine the vitality and viability of the retained shopping unit within an established neighbourhood parade. As such, the proposal is contrary to Policy SD6 and E9 of the London Plan (2021) and Policies CH1 and TC7 of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy with Detailed Policies (2014).

Reason 2

By reason of the insufficient outlook and privacy provided for the unit within the converted rear outbuilding, the unacceptable light provided for both lower ground floor units and the insufficient privacy provided for the outdoor amenity space serving the lower ground floor unit to the rear of no. 221 and 223 Plumstead High Street, the proposed development would fail to provide a suitable quality of accommodation for all future occupiers. Consequently, the proposed development would not be compliant with Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021), Policies H5 and DH1 of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy with Detailed Policies (2014) and the Technical Housing Standards – Nationally Described Space Standard (2015), the London Housing SPG (2016).

Reason 3

Insufficient information has been provided to demonstrate that the proposed development would not have an unacceptable impact on car parking stress within the surrounding street network contrary to Policies T6 and T6.1 of the London Plan (2021) and Policies IM4 and IM(c) of the Core Strategy (2021).

Policies cited
SD6
E9
CH1
TC7
D6
H5
DH1
T6
T6.1
IM4
IM(c)
Parties
Applicant
John John Scott
Timeline
13 Jan 2026
Application submitted
28 Jan 2026
Application validated
5 Jun 2026
Delegated decision: Refused
Supporting documents · 23
Officers delegated report5 Jun 2026View ↗
Decision notice5 Jun 2026View ↗
Pl103 a2 Feb 2026View ↗
Pl101 a.2 Feb 2026View ↗
Revised2 Feb 2026View ↗
Gab0020016 official copy title plan - 4086292 Feb 2026View ↗
Gab0020016 official copy title plan - 409620.2 Feb 2026View ↗
Gab0020016 official copy title plan - 4099342 Feb 2026View ↗
Gab0020016 official copy title plan - ln1531332 Feb 2026View ↗
Gab0020016 official copy title plan - ln95200.2 Feb 2026View ↗
Gab0020016 official copy title plan - tgl1234612 Feb 2026View ↗
Gab0020016 official copy title plan - tgl1347992 Feb 2026View ↗
Gab0020016 official copy title plan - tgl1524482 Feb 2026View ↗
Acknowledgement letter2 Feb 2026View ↗
Pl10213 Jan 2026View ↗
Pl10413 Jan 2026View ↗
Covering letter13 Jan 2026View ↗
Pl10513 Jan 2026View ↗
Fire statement report13 Jan 2026View ↗
Daylight report13 Jan 2026View ↗
Design and access statement13 Jan 2026View ↗
Commercial viability commentary13 Jan 2026View ↗
Sustainability statement13 Jan 2026View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Greenwich planning register.
Summary
Reference
26/0097/F
Type
Full Planning Permission
Applicant
John John Scott
Submitted
13 Jan 2026
Decision date
5 Jun 2026
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
20
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 12 wks over the 8-week target
Public response
Objections
1
In support
0
Total comments
1