Development Intent
AtlasRedbridgeAppeals3228281
Planning Atlas›Planning Inspectorate›Redbridge appeals›1886/20
Redbridge · Planning appeal · 2019-05-07

3228281 223 Dawlish Drive, IG3 9EH

Appeal allowedthe council was overturnedCosts awarded
Originating application — 1886/20

Redbridge refused 1886/20; the applicant appealed to the Planning Inspectorate. Redbridge decisions →

Winning arguments — policies cited
IG3
Costs decision

Costs were awarded (full) — the Inspectorate found a party behaved unreasonably.

From the decision letter

Costs Decisions by Felicity Thompson BA(Hons) MCD MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 11th March 2021 Costs application A in relation to Appeal Ref: APP/W5780/W/19/3228281 223 Dawlish Drive, IG3 9EH • • • The application is made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, sections 78, 322 and Schedule 6, and the Local Government Act 1972, section 250(5). The application is made by Mr Misbah Uddin for a full award of costs against the Council of the London Borough of Redbridge. The appeal was against the failure of the Council to issue a notice of their decision within the prescribed period on an application for approval required under Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A, Paragraph A.4 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) for a single storey rear extension. Costs application B in relation to Appeal …

At a glance
OutcomeAllowed
BoroughRedbridge
Application1886/20
Appeal ref3228281
Decided2019-05-07
The inspector
Felicity Thompson

The Planning Inspectorate inspector who decided this appeal.

From the Planning Inspectorate's published decision letter for appeal 3228281. The originating application reference and site are extracted from the letter. “Winning arguments” are the development-plan policies the inspector cited.