Development Intent
AtlasKensington and ChelseaOfficersRonaldo Colalillo
Planning Atlas›Kensington And Chelsea›Ronaldo Colalillo
Case officer · Kensington And Chelsea Planning

Ronaldo Colalillo.

Active — last recorded decision May 2026

A case officer at Kensington And Chelsea with an approval rate of 85% across 1,027 decided planning applications, spanning 18 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer1,027 decisions85% approvalSave
Kensington And Chelsea · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
1,027
Applications
2020–26
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%0%201980%202085%202190%202281%202384%202488%202595%2026
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compare — Versus peers
Approval rate85% · 67th of 89
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time— · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn— · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Ronaldo Colalillo's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Ronaldo Colalillo decided — 65 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

CL1Context and CharacterKensington And Chelsea plan
32 times cited
CL2Design QualityKensington And Chelsea plan
31 times cited
CL3Heritage Assets - Conservation Areas and HistoricKensington And Chelsea plan
30 times cited
CL6Small-scale Alterations and AdditionsKensington And Chelsea plan
30 times cited
CL5Living ConditionsKensington And Chelsea plan
26 times cited
CT1Improving alternatives to car useKensington And Chelsea plan
18 times cited
CE5Air QualityKensington And Chelsea plan
16 times cited
CE6Noise and VibrationKensington And Chelsea plan
16 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
179
88%
147
85%
137
80%
105
83%
95
88%
90
77%
68
83%
59
74%
31
85%
31
93%
27
95%
12
80%
11
100%
10
100%
9
100%
7
80%
4
100%
4
100%
179
88%
147
85%
137
80%
Show all 18 rows
105
83%
95
88%
90
77%
68
83%
59
74%
31
85%
31
93%
27
95%
12
80%
11
100%
10
100%
9
100%
7
80%
4
100%
4
100%

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2020–26.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
PP/26/00382
Planning Permission
Approved
2026-05-28
PP/26/01303
Planning Permission
Approved
2026-05-21
PP/26/00382
Planning Permission
Approved
2026-05-28
PP/26/01303
Planning Permission
Approved
2026-05-21
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 1,027 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data

No named planning consultants on this officer's decided applications.

At a glance
OfficerRonaldo Colalillo
RolePlanning officer
Experience—
Applications1,027 (2020–26)
Approval rate85%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Kensington And Chelsea planning register and published decision notices, 2020–26. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Kensington And Chelsea decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.