Development Intent
Planning AtlasGreenwichDH1
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Greenwich · Local Plan · Policy

DH1 — Design.

How Greenwich actually applies DH1: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

DH1 is a published Greenwich planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Greenwich Local Plan (adopted)

Greenwich · DH1
Where DH1 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~66
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
730
times cited
in parsed decision notices
73%
appeal survival
140 dismissed · 53 allowed at appeal
42 of 44
officer reach
95% of officers recorded in this period
BLACKHEATH WESTCOMBE
top hotspot ward
66 citations
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue DH1 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

DH1 appears most often in BLACKHEATH WESTCOMBE, SHOOTERS HILL, GREENWICH PARK. It appears across 42 of 44 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
77%
in approvals
562 citations
23%
in refusals
167 citations

This shows the decision reports in which DH1 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes; 1 citations sit outside the approval/refusal split.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why DH1 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance
73% survival
140 dismissed · 53 allowed · 1 split194 PINS appeal decisions cite DH1

From Planning Inspectorate decision letters that cite DH1. Dismissed = the council's refusal stood, the policy held; allowed = overturned. The tighter join — this borough's own refusals citing DH1 traced to their specific appeals — is still to come.

Related — follow the thread
Greenwich
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Greenwich's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Greenwich decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.