Development Intent
AtlasGreenwichOfficersAdam Price
Case officer · Greenwich Planning

Adam Price.

Last recorded decision Feb 2021 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Greenwich with an approval rate of 76% across 100 decided planning applications, spanning 8 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer100 decisions76% approvalSave
Greenwich · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
100
Applications
2020–21
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%74%202080%2021
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate76% · 29th of 57
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Adam Price's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Adam Price decided — 36 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

DH1DesignGreenwich plan
31 times cited
7.4Superseded
30 times cited
7.6Superseded
27 times cited
DH(A)Greenwich plan
22 times cited
7.8Superseded
18 times cited
DH3Heritage AssetsGreenwich plan
17 times cited
DH(H)Greenwich plan
14 times cited
DH(I)Greenwich plan
9 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
20/3212/F
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2021-03-10
20/3522/HD
Householders
Approved
2021-03-05
20/3212/F
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2021-03-10
20/3522/HD
Householders
Approved
2021-03-05
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 100 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. The Brunton Boobyer Partnership Ltd
2. Neal Tuson Architects
3. E F Planning
4. Plan It UK
At a glance
OfficerAdam Price
BoroughGreenwich
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications100 (2020–21)
Approval rate76%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Greenwich planning register and published decision notices, 2020–21. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Greenwich decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.