Development Intent
AtlasGreenwichOfficersFidel Miller
Case officer · Greenwich Planning

Fidel Miller.

Last recorded decision Jul 2021 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Greenwich with an approval rate of 71% across 170 decided planning applications, spanning 9 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer170 decisions71% approvalSave
Greenwich · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
170
Applications
2020–21
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%68%202074%2021
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate71% · 38th of 57
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Fidel Miller's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Fidel Miller decided — 29 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

7.4Superseded
26 times cited
DH1DesignGreenwich plan
25 times cited
DH(A)Greenwich plan
17 times cited
7.8Superseded
11 times cited
DH3Heritage AssetsGreenwich plan
11 times cited
DH(H)Greenwich plan
11 times cited
DH(B)Greenwich plan
7 times cited
DH(J)Greenwich plan
7 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
21/1655/HD
Householders
Approved
2021-12-09
21/0414/F
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2021-12-02
21/1655/HD
Householders
Approved
2021-12-09
21/0414/F
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2021-12-02
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 170 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. M A Newsome & Co Ltd
2. Neal Tuson Architects
3. YB ARCHITECTS
4. Resi
At a glance
OfficerFidel Miller
BoroughGreenwich
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications170 (2020–21)
Approval rate71%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Greenwich planning register and published decision notices, 2020–21. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Greenwich decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.