Development Intent
AtlasGreenwichOfficersCharlotte Norris
Planning Atlas›Greenwich›Charlotte Norris
Case officer · Greenwich Planning

Charlotte Norris.

Last recorded decision Apr 2024 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Greenwich with an approval rate of 66% across 200 decided planning applications, spanning 26 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer200 decisions66% approvalSave
Greenwich · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
200
Applications
2020–24
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%100%202068%202172%202257%202370%2024
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compare — Versus peers
Approval rate66% · 48th of 57
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time— · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn— · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Charlotte Norris's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Charlotte Norris decided — 12 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

DH1DesignGreenwich plan
10 times cited
NPPFNPPF
5 times cited
H5Housing DesignGreenwich plan
5 times cited
IM(B)Greenwich plan
5 times cited
IM(C)Greenwich plan
5 times cited
E(A)Greenwich plan
5 times cited
DH3Heritage AssetsGreenwich plan
4 times cited
DH(I)Greenwich plan
4 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
41
73%
22
64%
10
50%
10
40%
9
63%
8
75%
8
63%
7
50%
7
86%
6
50%
6
83%
6
67%
6
100%
5
60%
4
75%
4
67%
4
100%
3
67%
3
67%
2
50%
2
50%
2
50%
1
–
1
100%
1
0%
1
0%
41
73%
22
64%
10
50%
Show all 26 rows
10
40%
9
63%
8
75%
8
63%
7
50%
7
86%
6
50%
6
83%
6
67%
6
100%
5
60%
4
75%
4
67%
4
100%
3
67%
3
67%
2
50%
2
50%
2
50%
1
–
1
100%
1
0%
1
0%

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2020–24.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
24/0091/HD
Householders
Approved
2024-06-28
24/0275/F
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2024-06-14
24/0091/HD
Householders
Approved
2024-06-28
24/0275/F
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2024-06-14
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 200 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. DP9 Ltd
2. James Kay Architects
3. M.A. Newsome & Co Ltd
4. Ideaplan
At a glance
OfficerCharlotte Norris
BoroughGreenwich
RolePlanning officer
Experience—
Applications200 (2020–24)
Approval rate66%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Greenwich planning register and published decision notices, 2020–24. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Greenwich decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.