Development Intent
AtlasCamdenOfficersJohn Nicholls
Case officer · Camden Planning

John Nicholls.

Active — last recorded decision May 2026

A case officer at Camden with an approval rate of 96% across 156 decided planning applications, spanning 19 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer156 decisions96% approvalSave
Camden · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
156
Applications
2023–26
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%100%202396%202495%2025100%2026
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate96% · 21st of 76
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of John Nicholls's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications John Nicholls decided — 13 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

D2HeritageCamden plan
12 times cited
D1DesignCamden plan
9 times cited
DH2Camden plan
3 times cited
A1Managing the impact of development Camden plan
2 times cited
A4Noise and vibrationCamden plan
2 times cited
DH1Camden plan
2 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2023–26.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
2026/1809/L
Listed Building Consent
Approved
2026-05-06
2026/1556/NEW
Householder Application
Withdrawn
2026-04-20
2026/1809/L
Listed Building Consent
Approved
2026-05-06
2026/1556/NEW
Householder Application
Withdrawn
2026-04-20
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 156 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. SM Planning
2. Catherine Banfield Ltd
3. G.N.H. 2000 Limited
4. RAHUL TAHEEM LTD
At a glance
OfficerJohn Nicholls
BoroughCamden
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications156 (2023–26)
Approval rate96%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Camden planning register and published decision notices, 2023–26. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Camden decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.