Development Intent
AtlasCamdenOfficersObote Hope
Planning Atlas›Camden›Obote Hope
Case officer · Camden Planning

Obote Hope.

Active — last recorded decision May 2026

A case officer at Camden with an approval rate of 88% across 531 decided planning applications, spanning 38 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer531 decisions88% approvalSave
Camden · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
531
Applications
2020–26
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%89%202080%202195%202285%202394%202487%2025100%2026
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compare — Versus peers
Approval rate88% · 53rd of 76
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time— · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn— · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Obote Hope's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Obote Hope decided — 19 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

D1DesignCamden plan
13 times cited
D2HeritageCamden plan
12 times cited
CC2Adapting to climate changeCamden plan
3 times cited
A1Managing the impact of development Camden plan
3 times cited
CC1Climate change mitigationCamden plan
2 times cited
CC3Water and floodingCamden plan
2 times cited
G1Delivery and location of growthCamden plan
2 times cited
CC4Air qualityCamden plan
2 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
48
82%
32
95%
27
100%
25
95%
22
79%
22
79%
21
100%
20
94%
20
83%
18
83%
18
83%
17
100%
17
85%
17
92%
16
93%
16
92%
14
77%
13
100%
13
100%
13
83%
10
89%
10
83%
10
88%
8
86%
8
40%
8
100%
8
100%
8
88%
7
100%
7
71%
7
100%
7
83%
5
80%
3
50%
3
100%
3
100%
2
–
1
100%
48
82%
32
95%
27
100%
Show all 38 rows
25
95%
22
79%
22
79%
21
100%
20
94%
20
83%
18
83%
18
83%
17
100%
17
85%
17
92%
16
93%
16
92%
14
77%
13
100%
13
100%
13
83%
10
89%
10
83%
10
88%
8
86%
8
40%
8
100%
8
100%
8
88%
7
100%
7
71%
7
100%
7
83%
5
80%
3
50%
3
100%
3
100%
2
–
1
100%

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2020–26.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
2026/2121/P
Full Planning Permission
—
2026-05-26
2026/1998/P
Full Planning Permission
—
2026-05-18
2026/2121/P
Full Planning Permission
—
2026-05-26
2026/1998/P
Full Planning Permission
—
2026-05-18
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 531 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. TG Studio
2. SM Planning
3. aura homes ltd
4. Waldon Telecom Ltd
At a glance
OfficerObote Hope
BoroughCamden
RolePlanning officer
Experience—
Applications531 (2020–26)
Approval rate88%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Camden planning register and published decision notices, 2020–26. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Camden decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.