Development Intent
AtlasCamdenOfficersAndrew Mortimer
Planning Atlas›Camden›Andrew Mortimer
Case officer · Camden Planning

Andrew Mortimer.

Active — last recorded decision May 2026

A case officer at Camden with an approval rate of 50% across 16 decided planning applications, spanning 9 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer16 decisions50% approvalSave
Camden · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
16
Applications
2024–26
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average

Not enough dated decisions for a trend yet.

What they decide — by application type
How they compare — Versus peers
Approval rate50% · 76th of 76
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time— · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn— · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Andrew Mortimer's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Andrew Mortimer decided — 4 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

D1DesignCamden plan
3 times cited
D2HeritageCamden plan
2 times cited
A1Managing the impact of development Camden plan
1 times cited
A4Noise and vibrationCamden plan
1 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
3
–
2
–
2
0%
2
100%
2
–
2
–
1
–
1
–
1
–
3
–
2
–
2
0%
Show all 9 rows
2
100%
2
–
2
–
1
–
1
–
1
–

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2024–26.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
2026/2197/P
Householder Application
—
2026-05-29
2026/2196/P
Householder Application
—
2026-05-29
2026/2197/P
Householder Application
—
2026-05-29
2026/2196/P
Householder Application
—
2026-05-29
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 16 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. James Lambert Architects Ltd.
2. Landers & Associates
3. SIAW LTD
4. Hoeg Architects Ltd
At a glance
OfficerAndrew Mortimer
BoroughCamden
RolePlanning officer
Experience—
Applications16 (2024–26)
Approval rate50%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Camden planning register and published decision notices, 2024–26. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Camden decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.