Development Intent
AtlasWandsworthOfficersDylan Sanger
Case officer · Wandsworth Planning

Dylan Sanger.

Active — last recorded decision May 2026

A case officer at Wandsworth with an approval rate of 94% across 285 decided planning applications, spanning 10 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer285 decisions94% approvalSave
Wandsworth · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
285
Applications
2024–26
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%94%202495%202593%2026
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate94% · 34th of 68
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Dylan Sanger's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Dylan Sanger decided — 229 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

NPPFNPPF
200 times cited
LP2General Development PrinciplesWandsworth plan
199 times cited
LP1The Design-led ApproachWandsworth plan
198 times cited
LP3Historic EnvironmentWandsworth plan
44 times cited
LP14Air Quality, Pollution and Managing Impacts of DevelopmentWandsworth plan
16 times cited
LP27Housing StandardsWandsworth plan
13 times cited
LP5Wandsworth plan
7 times cited
LP56Tree Management and LandscapingWandsworth plan
6 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2024–26.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
2026/2004
Details (following full perm.)
2026-05
2026/1792
Householder
2026-05
2026/2004
Details (following full perm.)
2026-05
2026/1792
Householder
2026-05
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 285 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Resi Design Ltd
2. Andooi Design Ltd
3. Pddesign Consulting Limited
4. Revive Renovations Ltd
At a glance
OfficerDylan Sanger
BoroughWandsworth
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications285 (2024–26)
Approval rate94%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Wandsworth planning register and published decision notices, 2024–26. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Wandsworth decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.