Development Intent
Planning AtlasWandsworthLP56
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Wandsworth · Local Plan · Policy

LP56 — Tree Management and Landscaping.

How Wandsworth actually applies LP56: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

LP56 is a published Wandsworth planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Wandsworth Local Plan (adopted)

Wandsworth · LP56
Where LP56 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~31
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
275
times cited
in parsed decision notices
100%
appeal survival
5 dismissed · 0 allowed at appeal
34 of 67
officer reach
51% of officers recorded in this period
Wandsworth Common
top hotspot ward
31 citations
The policy — as adopted

Tree Management and Landscaping

A. The Council will require the retention and protection of existing trees and landscape features, including veteran trees. B. Where appropriate, planning applications must be supported by sufficient evidence to demonstrate that provision has been made for the incorporation of new trees, shrubs and other vegetation of landscape significance that complement existing, or create new, high-quality green areas, which deliver amenity, environmental, and biodiversity benefits. C. To ensure development protects, respects, contributes to and enhances trees and landscapes, the Council, when assessing development proposals, will: Trees and Woodlands 1. resist development that would result in the damage or loss of trees, including veteran trees and trees considered to be of townscape or amenity value, unless the tree is dead, dying or dangerous; or the tree is causing significant damage to adjacent structures; or the tree has little or no amenity value and it is not possible to retain the tree as part of the development; or felling is for reasons of good arboricultural practice; 2. consent for works to protected trees (Tree Preservation Orders and trees in Conservation Areas) will only be granted where; a. proposed works of pruning are in accordance with good arboricultural practice, or b. proposals for felling are properly justified through a detailed arboricultural and/or structural engineer’s report; and c. adequate replacement planting is proposed. 3. require, where practicable, an appropriate replacement on-site for any tree that is felled; where not practical, a financial contribution to the provision for an off-site tree in line with the monetary value of the existing tree to be felled will be required in line with the 'Capital Asset Value for Amenity Trees' (CAVAT); 4. resist development that would result in the loss or deterioration of irreplaceable habitat such as ancient woodland; 5. the Council will require that site design or layout ensures a harmonious relationship between trees and their surroundings and will resist development which will be likely to result in pressure to significantly prune or remove trees; 6. require the maintenance and suitability of new trees to be bespoke and considered from the beginning of the design process; 7. require new trees to be of a suitable species for the location in terms of height and root spread, taking account of space required for trees to mature; the use of native species will be encouraged where appropriate; and 8. require that trees are adequately protected throughout the course of development, in accordance with British Standard 5837 (Trees in relation to design, demolition and construction). D. The Council will serve a Tree Preservation Order or attach planning conditions which protect any trees considered to be of value to the townscape and amenity in order to secure their retention. Landscape E. The Council will: 1. require the retention of important existing landscape features; 2. require landscape design and materials to be of a high quality and be compatible with the surrounding landscape and character; and 3. require the provision of planting, including new trees, shrubs and other significant vegetation where appropriate.

Verbatim from the adopted Wandsworth plan · source document. The council's published plan is the authoritative version.

How it lands
89% in approvals · 5% in refusals
275 citations in the selected period
The approval/refusal split is subscriber intelligenceUnlock →
Where it bites
Wandsworth Common31
West Putney30
Trinity22
What cites it — application types
all years on record · click a slice to filter
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue LP56 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

LP56 appears most often in Wandsworth Common, West Putney, Trinity. It appears across 34 of 67 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
89%
in approvals
244 citations
5%
in refusals
15 citations

This shows the decision reports in which LP56 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes; 16 citations sit outside the approval/refusal split.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why LP56 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance
100% survival
5 dismissed · 0 allowed5 PINS appeal decisions cite LP56

From Planning Inspectorate decision letters that cite LP56. Dismissed = the council's refusal stood, the policy held; allowed = overturned. The tighter join — this borough's own refusals citing LP56 traced to their specific appeals — is still to come.

Related — follow the thread
Wandsworth
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Wandsworth's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Wandsworth decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.