Development Intent
Planning AtlasWaltham ForestDM23
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Waltham Forest · Local Plan · Policy

DM23 — Health and Well.

How Waltham Forest actually applies DM23: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

DM23 is a published Waltham Forest planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Waltham Forest Local Plan (adopted)

Waltham Forest · DM23
Where DM23 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~5
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
22
times cited
in parsed decision notices
88%
appeal survival
35 dismissed · 5 allowed at appeal
10 of 42
officer reach
24% of officers recorded in this period
Higham Hill
top hotspot ward
5 citations
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue DM23 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

DM23 appears most often in Higham Hill, Forest, Cann Hall. It appears across 10 of 42 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
23%
in approvals
5 citations
77%
in refusals
17 citations

This shows the decision reports in which DM23 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why DM23 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance
88% survival
35 dismissed · 5 allowed40 PINS appeal decisions cite DM23

From Planning Inspectorate decision letters that cite DM23. Dismissed = the council's refusal stood, the policy held; allowed = overturned. The tighter join — this borough's own refusals citing DM23 traced to their specific appeals — is still to come.

Related — follow the thread
Waltham Forest
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Waltham Forest's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Waltham Forest decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.