Development Intent
AtlasWaltham Forest
London Planning Authority · Outer London

Waltham Forest.

Waltham Forest is a London borough with an approval rate of 75% across 8,624 substantive planning decisions spanning 24 wards. Most decisions here are made under delegation rather than at committee.[1]

Outer London24 wards284 appeals99% delegatedSave
Waltham Forest · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glance · tap a metric to drill into this boroughAll investigations →
What wins here — Waltham Forest's policy playbook[3]

What Waltham Forest actually approves — its whole decision record, by application type — and the grounds its committee refuses on. Click through for the refusal grounds and the policies cited in the minutes.

Householder
Lawful
Full / major
Conditions
Data from publicly available Waltham Forest planning records and committee minutes 2020-01 – 2026-05.
Case officers
Officer
Active
Applications
Approval rate
Mostly decides
Active
850
83%
Householder
Active
733
84%
Householder
Active
451
82%
Householder
Active
410
72%
Householder
Active
402
79%
Full / major planning
Active
376
84%
Full / major planning
Active
369
78%
Householder
Active
358
69%
Householder
to 2025-08
325
71%
Householder
to 2022-01
323
65%
Full / major planning
Active
308
71%
Householder
to 2022-07
302
82%
Householder
Active
850
83%
Householder
Active
733
84%
Householder
Active
451
82%
Householder
Show all 12 rows
Active
410
72%
Householder
Active
402
79%
Full / major planning
Active
376
84%
Full / major planning
Active
369
78%
Householder
Active
358
69%
Householder
to 2025-08
325
71%
Householder
to 2022-01
323
65%
Full / major planning
Active
308
71%
Householder
to 2022-07
302
82%
Householder

Approval rates per officer, 2020–2026. Based on decided applications only. All Waltham Forest officers →

Planning committee members
Councillor
Ward
Party
Active
Cttee votes
Leaning
Endlebury
Conservative
to 2025-05
10
subscribers
Labour
to 2021-12
9
subscribers
Hoe Street
Labour
to 2025-05
7
subscribers
Leytonstone
Labour
Active
7
subscribers
St James
Labour
Active
7
subscribers
Grove Green
Labour
Active
7
subscribers
Lea Bridge
Labour
Active
6
subscribers
Markhouse
Labour
to 2021-03
6
subscribers
Endlebury
Conservative
to 2025-05
10
subscribers
Labour
to 2021-12
9
subscribers
Hoe Street
Labour
to 2025-05
7
subscribers
Show all 8 rows
Leytonstone
Labour
Active
7
subscribers
St James
Labour
Active
7
subscribers
Grove Green
Labour
Active
7
subscribers
Lea Bridge
Labour
Active
6
subscribers
Markhouse
Labour
to 2021-03
6
subscribers

Councillors on Waltham Forest's planning committee, by their recorded committee votes. “Leaning” = whether they tend to vote to approve or refuse. Full voting records →

Wards — ranked
Ward
Applications
Approval rate
Refusal rate
218
82%
17.6%
368
80%
20.4%
345
79%
21.1%
668
78%
22.0%
373
77%
22.5%
507
77%
23.3%
431
77%
23.4%
495
76%
23.5%
149
76%
23.7%
434
75%
24.8%
443
74%
25.6%
417
74%
25.9%
326
73%
27.0%
583
73%
27.2%
346
73%
27.3%
242
73%
27.4%
413
72%
27.7%
331
69%
31.0%
509
69%
31.2%
335
61%
38.8%
218
82%
17.6%
368
80%
20.4%
Show all 24 rows
345
79%
21.1%
668
78%
22.0%
373
77%
22.5%
507
77%
23.3%
431
77%
23.4%
495
76%
23.5%
149
76%
23.7%
434
75%
24.8%
443
74%
25.6%
417
74%
25.9%
326
73%
27.0%
583
73%
27.2%
346
73%
27.3%
242
73%
27.4%
413
72%
27.7%
331
69%
31.0%
509
69%
31.2%
335
61%
38.8%

Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the ward profile.

Consultant performance
Consultant
Applications
Approval rate
1. Civils Consulting Ltd
254
76%
2. Resi
202
82%
3. Archway Building Consultancy Limited
153
97%
4. Resi Design Ltd
113
81%
5. LONDON CONSULTANTS LTD
112
87%
6. Space 120 Architects
112
77%
7. Design Studio E17
108
74%
8. BLUELINE ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS LTD
88
75%
1. Civils Consulting Ltd
254
76%
2. Resi
202
82%
3. Archway Building Consultancy Limited
153
97%
Show all 8 rows
4. Resi Design Ltd
113
81%
5. LONDON CONSULTANTS LTD
112
87%
6. Space 120 Architects
112
77%
7. Design Studio E17
108
74%
8. BLUELINE ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS LTD
88
75%

Rankings based on applications submitted and decided. Performance from public planning records.

At a glance[2]
BoroughWaltham Forest
London approval avg81%
London overturn avg26%
Total appeals284
Appeals allowed65 (22.9%)
Conditions / approval3.02
Local plan

The adopted Waltham Forest Local Plan (targets, CIL, plan period) is a separate source still being loaded. What the record already shows: which applications win here, and the grounds refusals cite.

What wins →

Sources & method
  1. [1]Approval rates, decision times, delegation and ward breakdowns — London Borough of Waltham Forest planning register and published decision notices, 2020–2026. · methodology
  2. [2]London benchmarks, appeal overturn rates, appeals allowed and costs awarded — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) published appeal decisions. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]“What wins here” — Waltham Forest’s substantive decision record grouped by application type; committee refusal grounds and cited policies coded from published committee minutes.
  4. [4]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Waltham Forest grant/split decision notices, parsed from the published notice text (1,082 high-confidence notices).
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.