Development Intent
AtlasSuttonAppeals3366753
Planning AtlasPlanning InspectorateSutton appealsis
Sutton · Planning appeal · 2025-10-27

Appeal — is

Appeal allowedthe council was overturned
Originating application — is

Sutton refused is; the applicant appealed to the Planning Inspectorate. Sutton decisions →

Winning arguments — policies cited
SM1DM2024G3G4LP G3
From the decision letter

Appeal Decision Site visit made on 1 October 2025 by A Owen MA BA(Hons) MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State Decision date: 27 October 2025 Appeal Ref: APP/P5870/W/25/3366753 Rosehill Bowling Club Car Park, Angel Hill, Sutton SM1 3EH • • • • The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) against a refusal to grant approval required under Article 3(1) and Schedule 2, Part 16, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) (hereafter the ‘DPDO’). The appeal is made by Cornerstone against the decision of the Council of the London Borough of Sutton. The application Ref is DM2024/01457. The development proposed was originally described as the installation of 1no. 17.5m monopole supporting 6no. antennas and 2no. 300mm dishes, the installation of 2no. cabinets, and ancillar…

At a glance
OutcomeAllowed
BoroughSutton
Applicationis
Appeal ref3366753
Decided2025-10-27
The inspector
A Owen MA

The Planning Inspectorate inspector who decided this appeal.

From the Planning Inspectorate's published decision letter for appeal 3366753. The originating application reference and site are extracted from the letter. “Winning arguments” are the development-plan policies the inspector cited.