Development Intent
Planning AtlasLewishamQD7
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Lewisham · Local Plan · Policy

QD7 — (Amenity and agent of change)..

How Lewisham actually applies QD7: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

QD7 is a published Lewisham planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Lewisham Local Plan (adopted)

Lewisham · QD7
Where QD7 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~8
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
67
times cited
in parsed decision notices
1 appeal
appeal survival
0 dismissed · 1 allowed at appeal — too few to rate
12 of 28
officer reach
43% of officers recorded in this period
Lee Green
top hotspot ward
8 citations
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue QD7 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

QD7 appears most often in Lee Green, Catford South, Forest Hill. It appears across 12 of 28 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
93%
in approvals
62 citations
6%
in refusals
4 citations

This shows the decision reports in which QD7 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes; 1 citations sit outside the approval/refusal split.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why QD7 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance
survival
0 dismissed · 1 allowed1 PINS appeal decisions cite QD7

From Planning Inspectorate decision letters that cite QD7. Dismissed = the council's refusal stood, the policy held; allowed = overturned. Too few decisive appeals for a rate — the counts are the record. The tighter join — this borough's own refusals citing QD7 traced to their specific appeals — is still to come.

Related — follow the thread
Lewisham
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Lewisham's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Lewisham decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.