Development Intent
AtlasLewishamOfficersMegan Davies
Case officer · Lewisham Planning

Megan Davies.

Active — last recorded decision May 2026

A case officer at Lewisham with an approval rate of 89% across 377 decided planning applications, spanning 13 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer377 decisions89% approvalSave
Lewisham · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
377
Applications
2023–26
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%77%202394%202484%202581%2026
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate89% · 15th of 52
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Megan Davies's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Megan Davies decided — 27 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

QD7(Amenity and agent of change).Lewisham plan
5 times cited
D3London Plan
4 times cited
QD1Delivering high-quality design in LewishamLewisham plan
4 times cited
NPPFNPPF
3 times cited
QD9Building alterations, extensions and basement developmentLewisham plan
3 times cited
QD8High-quality housing design for diverse needsLewisham plan
2 times cited
QD10Design-led approach for infill and backland developmentLewisham plan
2 times cited
GR5Urban greening and treesLewisham plan
2 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2023–26.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
DC/26/143495
Householder Application
Approved
2026-06-04
DC/26/143354
Householder Application
Approved
2026-06-03
DC/26/143495
Householder Application
Approved
2026-06-04
DC/26/143354
Householder Application
Approved
2026-06-03
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 377 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Mulalley
2. Design Team
3. Resi Design Ltd
4. Silver Teal Property and Construction Consultants
At a glance
OfficerMegan Davies
BoroughLewisham
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications377 (2023–26)
Approval rate89%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Lewisham planning register and published decision notices, 2023–26. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Lewisham decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.