Development Intent
AtlasLambethOfficersCampbell Grace
Planning Atlas›Lambeth›Campbell Grace
Case officer · Lambeth Planning

Campbell Grace.

Last recorded decision Nov 2021 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Lambeth with an approval rate of 86% across 69 decided planning applications, spanning 8 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer69 decisions86% approvalSave
Lambeth · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
69
Applications
2021
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%88%202150%2022
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compare — Versus peers
Approval rate86% · 22nd of 72
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time— · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn— · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Campbell Grace's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Campbell Grace decided — 64 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

Q11Building alterations and extensionsLambeth plan
57 times cited
Q5Local distinctivenessLambeth plan
40 times cited
Q8Design quality: construction detailingLambeth plan
25 times cited
Q2AmenityLambeth plan
16 times cited
Q22Conservation areasLambeth plan
12 times cited
Q20Statutory listed buildingsLambeth plan
6 times cited
EN5Flood riskLambeth plan
3 times cited
T6ParkingLambeth plan
3 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
14
77%
12
83%
11
82%
11
90%
8
100%
7
100%
4
100%
2
50%
14
77%
12
83%
11
82%
Show all 8 rows
11
90%
8
100%
7
100%
4
100%
2
50%

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2021.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
21/04354/LB
Listed Building Consent
Refused
2022-01-12
21/04398/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2022-01-06
21/04354/LB
Listed Building Consent
Refused
2022-01-12
21/04398/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2022-01-06
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 69 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Resi
2. MoreSpace
3. Lucy Wood Architects
4. Fathorn Farrell Timms
At a glance
OfficerCampbell Grace
BoroughLambeth
RolePlanning officer
Experience—
Applications69 (2021)
Approval rate86%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Lambeth planning register and published decision notices, 2021. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Lambeth decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.