Development Intent
Planning AtlasKingston Upon ThamesTolworthApplication
Planning Application

25/02428/HOU

158 Hamilton Avenue Tolworth KT6 7PZ

HouseholderTolworth wardLondon Gatwick Safeguarding Zone (200m): Name: London Gatwic
Submission
17 Sep 2025
Target
4 Dec 2025
Decision
27 Nov 2025
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
27 Nov 2025
Decided by Carmellena Hickey under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Demolition of an existing rear conservatory and erection of a single storey rear extension.

Why it was refused
Reason 1

The applicant has failed to demonstrate through the submission of cogent information that the proposed rear extension would not have an unacceptable adverse impact on the closest habitable room windows at No. 160 Hamilton Avenue in terms of daylight/sunlight. Given the scale of the extension and the proximity of neighbouring windows it is considered that there is a likelihood that the development would breach the "BRE 45 Degree Rule" and reduce light entering into the neighbouring habitable room, which in turn would harm the residential amenities of the occupants of the neighbouring property. The proposal is therefore contrary to policy D3 of the London Plan 2021 and policy DM10 of the LDF Core Strategy 2012.

Policies cited
D3
DM10
Parties
Applicant
Joel Gomes
Timeline
17 Sep 2025
Application submitted
9 Oct 2025
Application validated
27 Nov 2025
Delegated decision: Refused
Supporting documents · 8
DECISION NOTICE - REFUSE - HOU27 Nov 2025View ↗
45 Degree Plan9 Oct 2025View ↗
Application Form (No personal data)17 Sep 2025View ↗
0117 Sep 2025View ↗
0417 Sep 2025View ↗
Proposed Elevations17 Sep 2025View ↗
0317 Sep 2025View ↗
Proposed Floor Plans17 Sep 2025View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Kingston Upon Thames planning register.
Summary
Reference
25/02428/HOU
Type
Householder
Applicant
Joel Gomes
Submitted
17 Sep 2025
Decision date
27 Nov 2025
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
10
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 2 wks over the 8-week target
Public response
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0