Development Intent
Planning AtlasKensington And ChelseaCL7
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Kensington And Chelsea · Local Plan · Policy

CL7 — Basements.

How Kensington And Chelsea actually applies CL7: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

CL7 is a published Kensington And Chelsea planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Kensington And Chelsea Local Plan (adopted)

Kensington And Chelsea · CL7
Where CL7 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~9
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
49
times cited
in parsed decision notices
50%
appeal survival
4 dismissed · 4 allowed at appeal
23 of 76
officer reach
30% of officers recorded in this period
Brompton and Hans Town
top hotspot ward
9 citations
What this policy is about

Policy CL7 requires all basement development in Kensington and Chelsea to meet specific conditions, including not exceeding 50% of the garden area, not adding further basement floors, and not causing harm to trees or heritage assets. The council will resist proposals that do not meet these conditions, particularly those that would harm the character and appearance of the locality or cause unacceptable harm to pedestrian or transport operations.

Plain-English summary of the adopted policy text below. The full text is the rule; this is the gist.

The policy — as adopted

Basements

The Council will require all basement development a. not exceed a maximum of 50 per cent of each g garden must be in a single area and where relevan neighbouring gardens. Exceptions may be made o b. not comprise more than one storey. Exceptions c. not add further basement floors where there is a a basement or one built through the exercise of pe d. not cause loss, damage or long term threat to tre e. comply with the tests in national policy as they r significance of heritage assets; f. not involve excavation underneath a listed buildin g. not introduce light wells and railings to the front harm the character and appearance of the locality, and positive feature of the local streetscape; h. maintain and take opportunities to improve the c wider area, with external elements such as light we sensitively designed and discreetly sited; in the cas impact of light pollution; i. include a sustainable drainage system (SuDS), to j. include a minimum of one metre of soil above an k. ensure that traffic and construction activity do no vehicular and road safety; adversely affect bus or o (e.g. cycle hire), significantly increase traffic conge the day to day life of those living, working and visiti l. ensure that construction impacts such as noise, v for the duration of the works; m. be designed to safeguard the structural stability other infrastructure including London Underground n. be protected from sewer flooding through the ins A specific policy requirement for basements is also ng and movement. The CTMP should take into ve or permitted construction works nearby nies). sess its effectiveness and will review it as a whole t to: garden or open part of the site. The unaffected nt should form a continuous area with other on large sites; may be made on large sites; an extant or implemented planning permission for ermitted development rights; ees of townscape or amenity value; elate to the assessment of harm to the ng (including vaults); or side of the property where they would seriously , particularly where they are not an established character or appearance of the building, garden or ells, roof lights, plant and means of escape being se of light wells and roof lights, also limit the o be retained thereafter; ny part of the basement beneath a garden; ot cause unacceptable harm to pedestrian, cycle, other transport operations estion, nor place unreasonable inconvenience on ing nearby; vibration and dust are kept to acceptable levels y of the existing building, nearby buildings and d tunnels and the highway; stallation of a suitable pumped device. o contained in policy CE2, Flooding. Existing Buildings - Roof Alterations/ 22.3.73 Additional storeys and roof level alteratio skyline as seen from neighbouring house neighbouring properties. 22.3.74 Proposals, must be assessed carefully a dominate the original building or surroun interesting skylines.

Verbatim from the adopted Kensington And Chelsea plan · source document. The council's published plan is the authoritative version.

How it lands
96% in approvals · 4% in refusals
49 citations in the selected period
The approval/refusal split is subscriber intelligenceUnlock →
Where it bites
Brompton and Hans Town9
Abingdon7
Queen's Gate5
What cites it — application types
all years on record · click a slice to filter
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue CL7 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

CL7 appears most often in Brompton and Hans Town, Abingdon, Queen's Gate. It appears across 23 of 76 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
96%
in approvals
47 citations
4%
in refusals
2 citations

This shows the decision reports in which CL7 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why CL7 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance
50% survival
4 dismissed · 4 allowed · 1 split9 PINS appeal decisions cite CL7

From Planning Inspectorate decision letters that cite CL7. Dismissed = the council's refusal stood, the policy held; allowed = overturned. The tighter join — this borough's own refusals citing CL7 traced to their specific appeals — is still to come.

Related — follow the thread
Kensington And Chelsea
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Kensington And Chelsea's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Kensington And Chelsea decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.