Development Intent
AtlasIslingtonCommittee
Planning AtlasIslingtonPlanning Committee
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
London Borough of Islington

Planning committee.

Islington's planning committee decides the applications officers don't settle under delegation. It approved 94% of the 156 decisions that reached it, hears just 1.1% of decisions to committee, and of the 4 refusals traced in recent minutes, 1 was overturned at appeal. Where it acts, and on what, is below.[1]

Labour majority7 members156 committee decisions2020–26
Islington · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
156
Committee decisions
2020–26
7
Members
Labour majority
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
Public planning-committee records, minutes and decision notices. Conduct in an official capacity only.
Members refusing officer-recommended approvals — London-wide[3]Dashed line = average per year
avg 4492016302017212018382019652020552021582022462023512024702025

Committee refusals of officer-recommended approvals traced in minutes across all 33 boroughs, by year. Islington's own officer-alignment trend needs the officer recommendation on each committee item — a minutes-level source still being loaded.

What goes to committee — by application type[1]
Full Planning Application: 72% — click to filter the pageFull Planning (Council's Own): 8% — click to filter the pageRemoval/Variation of Condition (Section 73): 7%Listed Building: 5% — click to filter the pageOther: 8%
Full Planning Application72%
Full Planning (Council's Own)8%
Removal/Variation of Condition (Section 73)7%
Listed Building5%
Other8%

Share of the 156 committee decisions on record. The call-in reason itself comes from committee minutes — not yet loaded.

In contextVersus London committees
Refusals in committee minutes4 · 30th of 33
lower is betterdashed = London avg
Refused against officer advice ⚠ unverified0 · 28th of 33
lower is betterdashed = London avg
Refusals overturned at appeal1 · 22nd of 33
lower is betterdashed = London avg
Grounds the committee acts on[2]

The policies most often cited on Islington refusal notices — borough-wide, across officer and committee decisions alike. Which of these specifically drove a committee departure from the officer recommendation needs minute-level coding, not yet loaded, so the two aren't separated below.

policies GG4, E11, H4, H6, SI 2, T4 and T6.1 of London Plan (2021)7×
NPPF4×
London Plan (2021) Policy D5 and D122×
16 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024)1×
15 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024)1×
Local Plan (2023) Policy DH41×
B3 of Islington’s Strategic and Development Management Policies (2023)1×

2 high-confidence refusal notices parsed for Islington. How often a refusal on each ground survives appeal isn't traced per policy yet.

How Islington applies its planning policies →
Decisions by ward

Where the 80 committee decisions on record land, 2020–26.[1] 16 carry no ward on the notice. Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the ward.

The members — votes recorded

Member by member: the planning-committee votes recorded against each councillor in the published minutes, and how they lean.[2] How often each votes with the officer recommendation needs the officer rec on every item — not yet loaded, so it isn't shown.

MemberForAgainstVotes
Jenny Kay180n=18Dave Poyser170n=17Phil Graham131n=14Tricia Clarke120n=12Benali Hamdache50n=5Martin Klute50n=5Bashir Ibrahim30n=3

Vote counts are matched from the minutes across inconsistent name forms and are still being completed. Click a member for every recorded vote.

Meeting minutes

The committee figures on this page are derived from Islington's published decision notices and committee minutes. Agendas, full minutes and webcasts are published on the council's own democracy website — the source of truth for every meeting.

How these figures are derived — methodology ↗
Recent committee decisions
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
P2022/1221/FUL
Full Planning Application
Approved
2026-01-08
P2022/2063/FUL
Full Planning Application
Approved
2024-10-11
P2022/1221/FUL
Full Planning Application
Approved
2026-01-08
P2022/2063/FUL
Full Planning Application
Approved
2024-10-11
Full decision history locked
Subscribe to see all 80 decisions →
Committee members— subscriber data
At a glance
CommitteePlanning Committee
ControlLabour majority
Members7
Decisions156 (2020–26)
Committee approval94%
Delegated98.9%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
Committee Watch →
When members overturn the officer line — and how those calls fare at appeal.
The politics of housing in Islington
Council composition, and how each councillor votes on planning applications.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Committee vs delegated split, committee approval rate and every committee-decided application — the decision-level field on Islington's published decision notices, 2020–26. · methodology
  2. [2]Committee membership, party control and per-member vote counts — Islington membership records and published planning-committee minutes; member matching across inconsistent name forms is still being completed.
  3. [3]Refusals against officer advice and appeal outcomes — committee minutes cross-matched with Planning Inspectorate appeal decisions (Committee Watch dataset, all 33 boroughs). · Committee Watch
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.