Development Intent
Planning AtlasHounslowSC7
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Hounslow · Local Plan · Policy

SC7 — - Residential extensions and alterations.

How Hounslow actually applies SC7: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

SC7 is a published Hounslow planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Hounslow Local Plan (adopted)

Hounslow · SC7
Where SC7 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~58
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
269
times cited
in parsed decision notices
52%
appeal survival
32 dismissed · 30 allowed at appeal
17 of 22
officer reach
77% of officers recorded in this period
Chiswick Homefields
top hotspot ward
58 citations
What this policy is about

Policy SC7 requires residential extensions and alterations to maintain the character of the area and not harm neighbouring residents or the environment. This will be achieved by ensuring development complies with relevant design guidance and standards. Homeowners and developers must design extensions to complement the original building, harmonise with adjoining properties, and respect the surrounding context.

Plain-English summary of the adopted policy text below. The full text is the rule; this is the gist.

The policy — as adopted

- Residential extensions and alterations

Hounslow | Local Plan Our approach We will support the extension and improvement of residential properties provided all extensions and alterations (including outbuildings, basements, and the construction of paving and driveways) maintain the character of the area, and do not result in harm to the amenity of neighbouring residents, existing and future occupants, and the built and natural environment. We will achieve this by (a) Requiring that all alterations and additions do not harm the existing character and appearance of the building and its context by ensuring development has regard to relevant design guidance and standards set out in Supplementary Planning Documents; (b) Ensuring development responds to and reflects the design recommendations in the Urban Character and Context Study and Conservation Area Appraisals; (c) Preparing guidance for basement extensions in the form of a Supplementary Planning Document; and (d) Using planning conditions to prevent the use of outbuildings or extensions as selfcontained dwellings. We will expect development proposals to (e) Complement the original building, harmonise with adjoining properties and maintain the character of the general street scene and the character and amenity of private spaces (including rear gardens); (f) Minimise harm to neighbouring residents (such as avoiding an unacceptable loss of daylight/sunlight, outlook or by creating an unacceptable sense of enclosure) and future occupants through high quality design; (g) In the case of an extension or outbuilding development, have regard to the quality, character, materials and scale of the principal building, be subordinate to the existing building, and not over develop the site in terms of mass and density; (h) Respect the surrounding established context including the quality and size of gardens. (i) Have regard to further design guidance as set out in Supplementary Planning Documents, and design recommendations in the Urban Context and Character Study and Conservation Area Appraisals; and (j) Have regard to the design standards set out in the Local Plan and Supplementary Planning Documents where the development of outbuildings, extensions and alterations are carried out under householder permitted development rights.

Verbatim from the adopted Hounslow plan · source document. The council's published plan is the authoritative version.

How it lands
99% in approvals · 0% in refusals
269 citations in the selected period
The approval/refusal split is subscriber intelligenceUnlock →
Where it bites
Chiswick Homefields58
Chiswick Riverside53
Turnham Green43
What cites it — application types
all years on record · click a slice to filter
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue SC7 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

SC7 appears most often in Chiswick Homefields, Chiswick Riverside, Turnham Green. It appears across 17 of 22 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
99%
in approvals
265 citations
0%
in refusals
1 citations

This shows the decision reports in which SC7 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes; 3 citations sit outside the approval/refusal split.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why SC7 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance
52% survival
32 dismissed · 30 allowed · 2 split64 PINS appeal decisions cite SC7

From Planning Inspectorate decision letters that cite SC7. Dismissed = the council's refusal stood, the policy held; allowed = overturned. The tighter join — this borough's own refusals citing SC7 traced to their specific appeals — is still to come.

Related — follow the thread
Hounslow
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Hounslow's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Hounslow decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.