Development Intent
AtlasHounslowOfficersNathan Ringer
Case officer · Hounslow Planning

Nathan Ringer.

Active — last recorded decision May 2026

A case officer at Hounslow with an approval rate of 73% across 551 decided planning applications, spanning 35 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer551 decisions73% approvalSave
Hounslow · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
551
Applications
2020–26
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%81%202070%202171%202272%202366%202450%2025100%2026
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate73% · 18th of 35
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Nathan Ringer's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Nathan Ringer decided — 278 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

CC1Context and characterHounslow plan
30 times cited
EC2Sustainable local transport network developmentHounslow plan
29 times cited
CC2Urban design and architectureHounslow plan
29 times cited
SI3London Plan
24 times cited
SI2London Plan
21 times cited
EQ1- Energy and carbon reductionHounslow plan
20 times cited
SC7- Residential extensions and alterationsHounslow plan
19 times cited
EQ2Sustainable design and constructionHounslow plan
19 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2020–26.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
P/2024/4346
Listed Building Consent to (alter/extend)
2026-06-16
P/2026/1463
Major Housing 10 units or more
2026-05-14
P/2024/4346
Listed Building Consent to (alter/extend)
2026-06-16
P/2026/1463
Major Housing 10 units or more
2026-05-14
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 551 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data

No named planning consultants on this officer's decided applications.

At a glance
OfficerNathan Ringer
BoroughHounslow
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications551 (2020–26)
Approval rate73%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Hounslow planning register and published decision notices, 2020–26. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Hounslow decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.