Development Intent
Planning AtlasHounslowEQ5
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Hounslow · Local Plan · Policy

EQ5 — - noise.

How Hounslow actually applies EQ5: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

EQ5 is a published Hounslow planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Hounslow Local Plan (adopted)

Hounslow · EQ5
Where EQ5 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~10
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
86
times cited
in parsed decision notices
62%
appeal survival
18 dismissed · 11 allowed at appeal
18 of 22
officer reach
82% of officers recorded in this period
Turnham Green
top hotspot ward
10 citations
What this policy is about

Policy EQ5 restricts noise-generating developments near residential areas. It requires noise assessments to be informed by British Standards. The council will resist new developments that do not meet noise reduction standards, particularly near Heathrow Airport, where a 69 dB LAeq 16h contour is considered a Significant Observed Adverse Effect Level (SOAEL).

Plain-English summary of the adopted policy text below. The full text is the rule; this is the gist.

The policy — as adopted

- noise

Notes Hounslow | Local Plan The council is producing a Development Control for Noise Generating and Noisesensitive Development SPD with the London Boroughs of Hillingdon and Richmond, which will provide guidance on the location and design of new development with regard to noise (expected 2014). The council’s draft Air Quality SPD (2013) provides guidance on noise considerations. British Standard BS8233: 2014 - Guidance on sound insulation and noise reduction for buildings, BS 4142:2014 (Method for Rating and assessing industrial and commercial sound and BS 6472-1:2008 (Guide to evaluation of human exposure to vibration in buildings) should inform noise assessments. Noise generating uses (such as industrial and commercial operations, food and drink establishments and other town centre uses) can impact on surrounding residential properties. It may be appropriate to restrict hours of operation, deliveries and refuse and recycling collection. Noise pollution includes vibration, and planning should limit human exposure to vibration under the Control of Pollution Act 1974, Part III, which gives local authorities powers to control noise from construction sites, and the Environmental Protection Act 1990, Part III (as amended by the Noise and Statutory Nuisance Act 1993), which requires local authorities. Abatement notices will be served where noise emitted from any premises, or from vehicles, machinery and equipment in the street, constitutes a statutory nuisance. The Aviation Policy Framework sets out the government’s policy on the noise impacts arising from aviation, including planning considerations that may be a material consideration in planning decisions. The framework expects airport operators to offer households exposed to levels of noise of 69 dB LAeq 16h or more, assistance with the costs of moving, and to offer acoustic insulation to noise-sensitive buildings, such as schools and hospitals, exposed to levels of noise of 63 dB LAeq 16h or more. Between the 69dBA LAeq and 63dBA LAeq contours there will be a presumption against family housing, whilst other smaller one bed and studio housing will only be accepted where high levels of sound insulation and ventilation are provided. There will also be a presumption against non-residential noise- sensitive development in this zone. In addition, between 63 and 57dBA LAeq contours all new built development, including residential extensions, should have high levels of sound attenuation and acoustically treated ventilation. The ICAO Balanced Approach encompasses four principal elements: reduction of noise at source; land use planning and management; noise abatement operational procedures; and operating restrictions on aircraft. The Aerodromes (Noise Restrictions) (Rules and Procedures) Regulations 2003 transpose European Directive 2002/30/EC on the establishment of rules and procedures with regard to the introduction of noise-related operating restrictions at Community airports into United Kingdom law. The regulations apply to major airport operators with over 50,000 civil jet aircraft movements a year (which includes Heathrow Airport) and reflect the adoption of the ICAO balanced approach to managing aircraft noise. Management of noise by Local Planning Authorities is also an element, and the borough considers that the 69 dB (A) LAeq 16h contour represents a Significant Observed Adverse Effect Level (SOAEL). As such, residential developments within this area are not permitted.

Verbatim from the adopted Hounslow plan · source document. The council's published plan is the authoritative version.

How it lands
92% in approvals · 0% in refusals
86 citations in the selected period
The approval/refusal split is subscriber intelligenceUnlock →
Where it bites
Turnham Green10
Hounslow Central9
Bedfont9
What cites it — application types
all years on record · click a slice to filter
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue EQ5 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

EQ5 appears most often in Turnham Green, Hounslow Central, Bedfont. It appears across 18 of 22 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
92%
in approvals
79 citations
0%
in refusals
0 citations

This shows the decision reports in which EQ5 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes; 7 citations sit outside the approval/refusal split.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why EQ5 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance
62% survival
18 dismissed · 11 allowed29 PINS appeal decisions cite EQ5

From Planning Inspectorate decision letters that cite EQ5. Dismissed = the council's refusal stood, the policy held; allowed = overturned. The tighter join — this borough's own refusals citing EQ5 traced to their specific appeals — is still to come.

Related — follow the thread
Hounslow
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Hounslow's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Hounslow decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.