Development Intent
Planning AtlasHillingdonDMT2
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Hillingdon · Local Plan · Policy

DMT2 — Highways Impacts.

How Hillingdon actually applies DMT2: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

DMT2 is a published Hillingdon planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Hillingdon Local Plan (adopted)

Hillingdon · DMT2
Where DMT2 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~48
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
438
times cited
in parsed decision notices
80%
appeal survival
24 dismissed · 6 allowed at appeal
36 of 46
officer reach
78% of officers recorded in this period
UXBRIDGE 2022
top hotspot ward
48 citations
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue DMT2 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

DMT2 appears most often in UXBRIDGE 2022, NORTHWOOD 2022, ICK/HAM & S HF/D 22. It appears across 36 of 46 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
99%
in approvals
432 citations
1%
in refusals
5 citations

This shows the decision reports in which DMT2 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes; 1 citations sit outside the approval/refusal split.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why DMT2 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance
80% survival
24 dismissed · 6 allowed30 PINS appeal decisions cite DMT2

From Planning Inspectorate decision letters that cite DMT2. Dismissed = the council's refusal stood, the policy held; allowed = overturned. The tighter join — this borough's own refusals citing DMT2 traced to their specific appeals — is still to come.

Related — follow the thread
Hillingdon
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Hillingdon's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Hillingdon decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.