Development Intent
AtlasHillingdonOfficersEmilie Bateman
Planning Atlas›Hillingdon›Emilie Bateman
Case officer · Hillingdon Planning

Emilie Bateman.

Active — last recorded decision May 2026

A case officer at Hillingdon with an approval rate of 83% across 1,199 decided planning applications, spanning 41 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer1,199 decisions83% approvalSave
Hillingdon · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
1,199
Applications
2021–26
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%73%202181%202287%202378%202487%202576%2026
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compare — Versus peers
Approval rate83% · 29th of 59
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time— · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn— · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Emilie Bateman's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Emilie Bateman decided — 422 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

DMHB11Design of New DevelopmentHillingdon plan
108 times cited
DMHB14Trees and LandscapingHillingdon plan
44 times cited
DMHB12Streets and Public Realm sets out how we canHillingdon plan
35 times cited
DMT2Highways ImpactsHillingdon plan
34 times cited
G5London Plan
27 times cited
DMEI10Water Management, Efficiency, and QualityHillingdon plan
26 times cited
SI13London Plan
24 times cited
NPPFNPPF
23 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
173
85%
159
78%
133
81%
132
85%
124
88%
69
84%
63
80%
52
84%
26
96%
16
88%
15
73%
14
79%
14
82%
13
69%
13
64%
13
60%
13
83%
11
89%
11
91%
11
86%
11
82%
10
67%
10
43%
10
100%
8
100%
7
86%
7
83%
6
50%
6
83%
6
83%
6
67%
5
100%
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
2
100%
173
85%
159
78%
133
81%
Show all 41 rows
132
85%
124
88%
69
84%
63
80%
52
84%
26
96%
16
88%
15
73%
14
79%
14
82%
13
69%
13
64%
13
60%
13
83%
11
89%
11
91%
11
86%
11
82%
10
67%
10
43%
10
100%
8
100%
7
86%
7
83%
6
50%
6
83%
6
83%
6
67%
5
100%
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
4
100%
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
2
100%

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2021–26.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
18377/APP/2026/131
Planning Application
Approved
2026-05-28
2082/APP/2025/2833
Planning Application
Approved
2026-05-27
18377/APP/2026/131
Planning Application
Approved
2026-05-28
2082/APP/2025/2833
Planning Application
Approved
2026-05-27
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 1,199 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Mr Ransford Stewart The Windmill Studio Centre
2. Mr Karran Corpaul THE WHITE HOUSE DESIGN LTD
3. Mr Finch Moor House Farm Estate Lower Road Higher Denham Uxbridge UB9
4. Mr Juchau Moor House Farm Estate Lower Road Higher Denham Uxbridge UB9
At a glance
OfficerEmilie Bateman
BoroughHillingdon
RolePlanning officer
Experience—
Applications1,199 (2021–26)
Approval rate83%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Hillingdon planning register and published decision notices, 2021–26. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Hillingdon decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.