Development Intent
AtlasHillingdonOfficersRebekah Mccullough
Planning Atlas›Hillingdon›Rebekah McCullough
Case officer · Hillingdon Planning

Rebekah McCullough.

Last recorded decision Sep 2023 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Hillingdon with an approval rate of 84% across 213 decided planning applications, spanning 25 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer213 decisions84% approvalSave
Hillingdon · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
213
Applications
2022–23
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average

Not enough dated decisions for a trend yet.

What they decide — by application type
How they compare — Versus peers
Approval rate84% · 26th of 59
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time— · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn— · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Rebekah McCullough's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Rebekah McCullough decided — 62 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

DMHB11Design of New DevelopmentHillingdon plan
11 times cited
NPPFNPPF
5 times cited
DMHB18Private Outdoor Amenity SpaceHillingdon plan
2 times cited
DMHB1Heritage AssetsHillingdon plan
2 times cited
DMHB4Conservation AreasHillingdon plan
2 times cited
DMHB12Streets and Public Realm sets out how we canHillingdon plan
1 times cited
DMTC4Amenity and Town Centre UsesHillingdon plan
1 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
21
81%
20
85%
18
94%
18
94%
16
80%
15
93%
14
93%
12
58%
10
60%
9
89%
9
100%
8
75%
7
100%
7
57%
5
100%
5
100%
4
100%
3
33%
3
100%
2
0%
2
100%
2
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
21
81%
20
85%
18
94%
Show all 25 rows
18
94%
16
80%
15
93%
14
93%
12
58%
10
60%
9
89%
9
100%
8
75%
7
100%
7
57%
5
100%
5
100%
4
100%
3
33%
3
100%
2
0%
2
100%
2
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2022–23.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
77809/APP/2023/1129
Planning Application
Approved
2023-12-11
76272/APP/2023/1791
Planning Application
Approved
2023-12-08
77809/APP/2023/1129
Planning Application
Approved
2023-12-11
76272/APP/2023/1791
Planning Application
Approved
2023-12-08
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 213 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Amico Design Farriers Barn, Station Farm Denton Road, Horton Northampton NN7
2. other TRICON DESIGN STUDIO
3. Mr Kamal Panesar The Studio
4. Other XEVA DESIGN STUDIO
At a glance
OfficerRebekah McCullough
BoroughHillingdon
RolePlanning officer
Experience—
Applications213 (2022–23)
Approval rate84%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Hillingdon planning register and published decision notices, 2022–23. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Hillingdon decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.