Development Intent
AtlasHillingdonOfficersRebecca Lo
Planning Atlas›Hillingdon›Rebecca Lo
Case officer · Hillingdon Planning

Rebecca Lo.

Last recorded decision Jul 2021 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Hillingdon with an approval rate of 74% across 171 decided planning applications, spanning 22 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer171 decisions74% approvalSave
Hillingdon · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
171
Applications
2020–21
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%78%202071%2021
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compare — Versus peers
Approval rate74% · 39th of 59
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time— · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn— · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Rebecca Lo's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Rebecca Lo decided — 72 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

DMHB11Design of New DevelopmentHillingdon plan
6 times cited
DMHB21Telecommunications below sets out furtherHillingdon plan
3 times cited
DMT5Pedestrians and CyclistsHillingdon plan
3 times cited
DMT6Vehicle ParkingHillingdon plan
3 times cited
EM8Hillingdon plan
3 times cited
6.13Superseded
2 times cited
6.3Superseded
2 times cited
7.15Superseded
2 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
42
88%
19
84%
16
88%
15
73%
10
100%
7
29%
7
57%
7
25%
6
100%
6
67%
5
100%
5
0%
5
20%
5
25%
4
50%
3
67%
3
100%
2
–
1
100%
1
–
1
0%
1
0%
42
88%
19
84%
16
88%
Show all 22 rows
15
73%
10
100%
7
29%
7
57%
7
25%
6
100%
6
67%
5
100%
5
0%
5
20%
5
25%
4
50%
3
67%
3
100%
2
–
1
100%
1
–
1
0%
1
0%

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2020–21.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
1331/APP/2021/2625
Planning Application
Withdrawn
2021-08-05
75918/APP/2021/1876
Planning Application
Withdrawn
2021-08-02
1331/APP/2021/2625
Planning Application
Withdrawn
2021-08-05
75918/APP/2021/1876
Planning Application
Withdrawn
2021-08-02
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 171 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Mr Daniel Mc Carthy Invent Architecture Ltd.
2. Mr Sam Wismayer W H P Telecoms Limited Troy Mills, Helena House Troy Road, Horsforth Leeds LS18
3. TINA PATEL Formed Architects & Designers Third Floor, Gable House,
4. Miss Nuala Wheatley Nathaniel Lichfields & Partners The Minster Building
At a glance
OfficerRebecca Lo
BoroughHillingdon
RolePlanning officer
Experience—
Applications171 (2020–21)
Approval rate74%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Hillingdon planning register and published decision notices, 2020–21. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Hillingdon decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.