Development Intent
AtlasHillingdonOfficersHardev Gill
Planning Atlas›Hillingdon›Hardev Gill
Case officer · Hillingdon Planning

Hardev Gill.

Last recorded decision Aug 2023 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Hillingdon with an approval rate of 75% across 692 decided planning applications, spanning 41 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer692 decisions75% approvalSave
Hillingdon · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
692
Applications
2021–23
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%84%202175%202270%2023
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compare — Versus peers
Approval rate75% · 36th of 59
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time— · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn— · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Hardev Gill's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Hardev Gill decided — 169 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

DMHB11Design of New DevelopmentHillingdon plan
27 times cited
DMHB14Trees and LandscapingHillingdon plan
6 times cited
NPPFNPPF
5 times cited
DMT2Highways ImpactsHillingdon plan
5 times cited
DMHB12Streets and Public Realm sets out how we canHillingdon plan
5 times cited
DMEI1Living Walls and Roofs and on-site VegetationHillingdon plan
5 times cited
DMHD2OutbuildingsHillingdon plan
4 times cited
D7London Plan
3 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
44
80%
40
69%
39
88%
33
72%
32
70%
32
60%
30
75%
29
62%
26
68%
26
71%
26
67%
26
75%
24
67%
22
75%
20
84%
19
100%
17
77%
17
59%
16
100%
16
93%
15
69%
14
86%
14
77%
13
75%
10
100%
9
71%
9
75%
8
86%
8
75%
7
86%
7
100%
7
50%
7
43%
6
83%
6
80%
4
75%
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
3
33%
2
100%
44
80%
40
69%
39
88%
Show all 41 rows
33
72%
32
70%
32
60%
30
75%
29
62%
26
68%
26
71%
26
67%
26
75%
24
67%
22
75%
20
84%
19
100%
17
77%
17
59%
16
100%
16
93%
15
69%
14
86%
14
77%
13
75%
10
100%
9
71%
9
75%
8
86%
8
75%
7
86%
7
100%
7
50%
7
43%
6
83%
6
80%
4
75%
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
3
33%
2
100%

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2021–23.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
19892/APP/2023/1419
Planning Application
Approved
2023-10-26
46309/APP/2023/1753
Planning Application
Approved
2023-10-13
19892/APP/2023/1419
Planning Application
Approved
2023-10-26
46309/APP/2023/1753
Planning Application
Approved
2023-10-13
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 692 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Other TRICON DESIGN STUDIO
2. Other XEVA DESIGN LTD STUDIO
3. mr SABIR AHMED Johal & Co Accountant London W7
4. EnGage Reliance Ltd
At a glance
OfficerHardev Gill
BoroughHillingdon
RolePlanning officer
Experience—
Applications692 (2021–23)
Approval rate75%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Hillingdon planning register and published decision notices, 2021–23. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Hillingdon decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.