Development Intent
AtlasHillingdonOfficersDiane Verona
Planning Atlas›Hillingdon›Diane Verona
Case officer · Hillingdon Planning

Diane Verona.

Last recorded decision Feb 2021 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Hillingdon with an approval rate of 74% across 539 decided planning applications, spanning 20 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer539 decisions74% approvalSave
Hillingdon · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
539
Applications
2020–21
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%73%202076%2021
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compare — Versus peers
Approval rate74% · 40th of 59
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time— · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn— · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Diane Verona's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Diane Verona decided — 195 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

NPPFNPPF
14 times cited
DMHB11Design of New DevelopmentHillingdon plan
1 times cited
1Superseded
1 times cited
5.15Superseded
1 times cited
DMEI10Water Management, Efficiency, and QualityHillingdon plan
1 times cited
DMEI12Development of Land Affected by ContaminationHillingdon plan
1 times cited
5Superseded
1 times cited
13Superseded
1 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
95
67%
73
82%
56
85%
55
69%
55
71%
49
88%
46
83%
44
70%
17
53%
15
67%
10
30%
7
67%
4
50%
4
75%
3
67%
2
100%
1
0%
1
0%
1
100%
1
100%
95
67%
73
82%
56
85%
Show all 20 rows
55
69%
55
71%
49
88%
46
83%
44
70%
17
53%
15
67%
10
30%
7
67%
4
50%
4
75%
3
67%
2
100%
1
0%
1
0%
1
100%
1
100%

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2020–21.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
1983/APP/2021/550
Planning Application
Refused
2021-04-15
66185/APP/2021/738
Planning Application
Refused
2021-04-13
1983/APP/2021/550
Planning Application
Refused
2021-04-15
66185/APP/2021/738
Planning Application
Refused
2021-04-13
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 539 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Mr James Hughes The Market Design & Build,
2. Mr Mark Pottle Pottle & Co. Ltd. Suite A
3. Mr Tyrrell Moor House Farm Estate Lower Road Higher Denham Uxbridge UB9
4. Mr Semsettin Karahan Zanoply Ltd Building
At a glance
OfficerDiane Verona
BoroughHillingdon
RolePlanning officer
Experience—
Applications539 (2020–21)
Approval rate74%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Hillingdon planning register and published decision notices, 2020–21. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Hillingdon decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.