Development Intent
Planning AtlasHavering8
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Havering · Local Plan · Policy

8 — Houses in Multiple Occupation.

How Havering actually applies 8: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

8 is a published Havering planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Havering Local Plan (adopted)

Havering · 8
Where 8 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~3
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
26
times cited
in parsed decision notices
appeal survival
no PINS appeal decisions cite it
6 of 14
officer reach
43% of officers recorded in this period
Elm Park
top hotspot ward
3 citations
What this policy is about

Policy 8: Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMOs) in Havering. HMOs are allowed where they don't harm the area, meet size and parking requirements, and don't exceed 10% of properties in one street becoming HMOs. Detached houses can be converted to HMOs without permission, but semi-detached and terraced houses need permission. HMOs must have communal space and meet East London HMO guidance.

Plain-English summary of the adopted policy text below. The full text is the rule; this is the gist.

The policy — as adopted

Houses in Multiple Occupation

The Council recognises that Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMOs) can make a valuable contribution to the private rented sector by catering for the housing needs of specific groups. This needs to be balanced with the potential harm that can arise from such development if they are not subject to control. The Council will support applications for HMOs where it can be demonstrated that: i. The overall size of the original property to be converted is not less than 120 sq m; ii. The proposal does not result in more than 10% of properties in one street becoming HMOs (including existing lawful HMOs) or more than two adjacent properties becoming HMOs, thereby undermining the principle of mixed communities; iii. The proposal does not have an adverse impact on the surrounding area and will not be likely to give rise to significantly greater levels of noise and disturbance to occupiers of nearby residential properties than would a single family dwelling of equivalent size; iv. The proposal meets Havering's parking requirements and it will not have an unacceptable impact on parking conditions and traffic congestion in the area; v. Adequate, secure and well screened refuse storage is provided within the curtilage of the site and is accessible by all residents; vi. The property contains communal space, including either a dining or living area, large enough for all the dwelling’s occupants to use simultaneously; and vii. The proposal meets the requirements of the East London HMO guidance. 7.6.1 In 2015, the Council introduced two Article 4 Directions that removed permitted development rights to convert properties to Houses in Multiple Occupation. Evidence suggests a trend towards conversion of smaller dwellings to form HMOs including semi-detached and terraced houses, particularly within Brooklands, Romford Town, Heaton and Gooshays wards. Direction Art4/1/2015 requires planning permission for the formation of an HMO from any existing residential property type encompassing detached, semi-detached and terrace houses and flats anywhere within these wards. Direction Art4/2/2015 introduces the requirement for planning permission to be obtained for the formation of an HMO from any existing semidetached or terraced house or flat anywhere within the remainder of the borough. The change of use from a detached house to a HMO (use class C4) is not covered by the second Article 4 Direction. 7.6.2 The threshold of 10% HMOs per street has been applied in order to ensure there are mixed communities in the borough. The limit aims to prevent the concentration of HMOs in certain roads and certain areas within these roads and to ensure an even distribution of HMOs across the borough. The 10% threshold will be applied to each named street, using Havering's HMO licencing register as a record of existing lawful HMOs in the borough. London Borough of Havering Local Plan 2016-2031 Adopted 2021 7 Successful Places to Live 7.6.3 The Council’s policies seek to deliver appropriate residential conversions whilst maintaining a supply of family housing; this policy is in line with the strategic housing need of the borough. The Outer North East London SHMA identified a need for three bedroom properties in the borough, meaning the conversion of small family homes to HMOs would have a particularly negative impact on the supply of family housing. In order to protect family housing, properties must be at lease 120sq m in order for a conversion to an HMO to be considered acceptable. 7.6.4 All HMOs will also be expected to comply with the East London HMO guidance which has been adopted by the Council and sets out quality and minimum living space standards.

Verbatim from the adopted Havering plan · source document. The council's published plan is the authoritative version.

How it lands
0% in approvals · 100% in refusals
26 citations in the selected period
The approval/refusal split is subscriber intelligenceUnlock →
Where it bites
Elm Park3
Heaton3
Marshalls & Rise Pk3
What cites it — application types
all years on record · click a slice to filter
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue 8 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

8 appears most often in Elm Park, Heaton, Marshalls & Rise Pk. It appears across 6 of 14 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
0%
in approvals
0 citations
100%
in refusals
26 citations

This shows the decision reports in which 8 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why 8 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance

No Planning Inspectorate appeal decisions on record cite 8. When one lands (the appeals table refreshes each weekday), the dismissed/allowed record appears here — never estimated.

Related — follow the thread
Havering
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Havering's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Havering decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.