Development Intent
AtlasHaveringOfficersCole Hodder
Planning Atlas›Havering›Cole Hodder
Case officer · Havering Planning

Cole Hodder.

Active — last recorded decision May 2026

A case officer at Havering with an approval rate of 58% across 690 decided planning applications, spanning 28 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer690 decisions58% approvalSave
Havering · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
690
Applications
2020–26
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%61%202060%202159%202262%202351%202458%202556%2026
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compare — Versus peers
Approval rate58% · 26th of 34
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time— · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn— · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Cole Hodder's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Cole Hodder decided — 36 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

NPPFNPPF
21 times cited
26Urban designHavering plan
12 times cited
7Residential design and amenityHavering plan
9 times cited
135NPPF
9 times cited
34Managing pollutionHavering plan
7 times cited
T6London Plan
7 times cited
D6London Plan
6 times cited
G2London Plan
5 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
65
63%
60
66%
51
53%
44
66%
34
58%
32
76%
30
52%
30
50%
30
58%
27
60%
26
54%
26
57%
25
65%
24
35%
24
41%
22
47%
22
62%
21
80%
21
74%
19
40%
18
63%
15
36%
9
63%
6
60%
5
60%
2
100%
1
0%
1
100%
65
63%
60
66%
51
53%
Show all 28 rows
44
66%
34
58%
32
76%
30
52%
30
50%
30
58%
27
60%
26
54%
26
57%
25
65%
24
35%
24
41%
22
47%
22
62%
21
80%
21
74%
19
40%
18
63%
15
36%
9
63%
6
60%
5
60%
2
100%
1
0%
1
100%

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2020–26.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
P0367.26
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2026-06-04
P0271.26
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2026-05-27
P0367.26
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2026-06-04
P0271.26
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2026-05-27
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 690 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Spaces Architecture Ltd
2. Mr A MARTIN Crown House Home Gardens Dartford DA1
3. Andrew Ransome ADP Ltd
4. Mr Joel Walsh Town Wall House Balkerne Hill Colchester CO3
At a glance
OfficerCole Hodder
BoroughHavering
RolePlanning officer
Experience—
Applications690 (2020–26)
Approval rate58%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Havering planning register and published decision notices, 2020–26. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — Havering's decision-notice parsing is limited coverage, so no borough or officer figure is shown.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.