Development Intent
AtlasGreenwichCouncillorsNas_asghar
Planning AtlasGreenwichNas Asghar
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Councillor · Plumstead Common, Greenwich

Nas Asghar.

A Labour member representing Plumstead Common in Greenwich. 57% of the interventions we could place on the map fall inside Plumstead Common itself.

LabourPlumstead Common ward
Greenwich · Nas Asghar's interventions
Decisions — geocoded
ApprovedRefusedOther
⚠ Ward/map data below is built on councillor intervention records not yet through the doc-parser verification pass — treat as provisional.
⚠ “Committee sided/against” below is unverified — pending re-extraction of the officer-recommendation field.
At a glance · committee recordAll investigations →
7
Interventions
at committee
Meetings
attended
57%
In own ward
of resolved interventions
What they raise — by topicSubscriber
Sunlight
4
Overlooking
4
Noise
4
Parking
4
Neighbour impact
3
Density
2
Construction
1
Subscribe to see what Nas Asghar raises, by real topicSubscribe to unlock →
How they intervene — by type
Ward objection
4

How Nas Asghar acts at committee, by type of intervention.

Intervention history

Where Nas Asghar moved, seconded, objected to, supported or voted on applications at committee, from the published minutes.

Intervention
Application
Committee
Date
Ward objection
Local Planning Committee
2024-11-26
Ward objection
Local Planning Committee
2024-11-26
Ward objection
Local Planning Committee
2024-11-26
Local Planning Committee
2024-11-26
Ward objection
Local Planning Committee
2024-11-26
Ward objection
Local Planning Committee
2024-11-26
Ward objection
Local Planning Committee
2024-11-26
Show all 4 rows
Local Planning Committee
2024-11-26
At a glance
PartyLabour
WardPlumstead Common
Planning committeeNo
CouncilGreenwich
Committee appearances, interventions and votes from Greenwich planning-committee minutes. “Committee sided” = voted in line with the officer recommendation. Councillor records are matched from the minutes across inconsistent name forms and are still being completed. The map above plots 7 of their 7 interventions (100%) that we could match to a specific application in our own scraped records — the rest reference applications outside that coverage (older cases, or a different borough's register) and aren't placeable yet. See political control and the committee.