Planning committee member · Charlton Village & Riverside, Greenwich
Gary Dillon.
A Labour member representing Charlton Village & Riverside in Greenwich. Sits on the planning committee, with 175 recorded interventions — voting with the officer recommendation 88.2% of the time. 3% of the interventions we could place on the map fall inside Charlton Village & Riverside itself.
LabourCharlton Village & Riverside wardPlanning committee
Greenwich · Gary Dillon's interventions
Decisions — geocoded
ApprovedRefusedOther
⚠ Ward/map data below is built on councillor intervention records not yet through the doc-parser verification pass — treat as provisional.
⚠ “Committee sided/against” below is unverified — pending re-extraction of the officer-recommendation field.
At a glance · committee recordAll investigations →
175
Interventions
at committee
91
Meetings
attended
3%
In own ward
of resolved interventions
What they raise — by topicSubscriber
Bulk mass
7
Height
6
Neighbour impact
5
Procedural
4
Conservation
4
Design
3
Amenity space
3
Heritage
3
Subscribe to see what Gary Dillon raises, by real topicSubscribe to unlock →
How they intervene — by type
Moved approval
19
Declared interest
9
Supported
2
Moved refusal
2
Questioned
2
How Gary Dillon acts at committee, by type of intervention.
Intervention history
Where Gary Dillon moved, seconded, objected to, supported or voted on applications at committee, from the published minutes.
1–10 of 25
Intervention
Application
Committee
Date
Show all 10 rows
Who decides here
Committee appearances, interventions and votes from Greenwich planning-committee minutes. “Committee sided” = voted in line with the officer recommendation. Councillor records are matched from the minutes across inconsistent name forms and are still being completed. The map above plots 162 of their 173 interventions (94%) that we could match to a specific application in our own scraped records — the rest reference applications outside that coverage (older cases, or a different borough's register) and aren't placeable yet. See political control and the committee.