Development Intent
Planning AtlasEnfieldSouthgateApplication
Planning Application

23/04120/FUL

47 The Bourne London N14 6RS

Full / Other PlanningSouthgate wardSite of Archaeological Interest: Description: Archaeological
Submission
18 Dec 2023
Target
15 Feb 2024
Decision
18 Mar 2024
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
18 Mar 2024
Decided by Andrew Parker under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Redevelopment and sub-division of site by the erection of 4 semi-detached house 2-storey dwelling houses and 1 detached 2-storey dwellinghouse with provision of associated surface car parking.

Why it was refused
Reason 1

The proposed development, by reason of the design of fenestration and materials proposed in respect of Houses 1 and 2; would result in a discordant form of development that fails to relate satisfactorily to the adjacent Locally Listed Bourne Methodist Church and hall and the extensive hard surfacing to the front of the site, boundary treatment and overall layout which makes insufficient provision for soft landscaping would detract from the visual amenities of the street scene and the open character and appearance of the surrounding area. The proposal is contrary to Section 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework 2023; Policies D3 and D4 of the London Plan 2021, Policies CP30 and CP31 of the Core Strategy 2010, Policies DMD 6, DMD8, DMD37 and DMD44 of the Enfield Development Management Document 2014.

Reason 2

The proposal would provide a poor and unacceptable standard of accommodation in terms of perceived privacy and overlooking between the proposed dwelling houses and to their respective private amenity space, detrimental to the living conditions of future occupiers of the development and would result in a contrived form of development which is indicative of the over intensive of the site. The proposal is contrary to Section 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework 2023; Policy D6 of The London Plan 2021, Policy CS4 of the Core Strategy 2010, Policies DMD6, DMD8 and DMD 10 of the Development Management Document (2014).

Reason 3

The proposed development fails to sufficiently demonstrate that adequate parking, operational refuse storage and functional access arrangements would be provided. As such, the proposal would be prejudicial to highway and pedestrian safety and the free flow of traffic on The Bourne, a Classified Road. The proposal fails to ensure that adequate facilities and functional services would be provided of future occupiers and ensure that their safety would not be prejudiced. The proposal would be contrary to Section 9 of the National Planning Policy Framework 2023; Policies D3, D12, T4 and T6 of the London Plan 2021, Policy CS24 of the Core Strategy 2010 and Policies DMD6, DMD8, DMD45, DMD46 and DMD47 of the Development Management Document 2014. Dated: 18 March 2024 Authorised on behalf of: Karen Page Head of Planning and Building Control Housing, Regeneration and Development Department Enfield Council PO Box 53, Civic Centre Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3XE If you have any questions about this decision, please contact the planning officer andrew.parker@enfield.gov.uk. List of plans and documents referred to in this Notice: Title/Number Version TYPE E2 10 Drawing EP 301 Drawing EP303 Drawing EP304 Drawing E1 10 Drawing P002 Drawing P001 Drawing P2 10 Drawing P1 10 Drawing P2 11 Drawing P1 11 Drawing P212 Drawing P112 Drawing P005 Drawing P003 Drawing P004 Drawing EP 302 Rev P1 Drawing P006 Drawing Design and Acess Statement Supporting Information E101 Supporting Information Preliminary Ecological Assessment Supporting Information Daylight, Sunlight and Overshadowing Assessments Supporting Information Land Contamination Assessment Supporting Information Building Regulations Compliance Report Supporting Information Construction Management Plan Supporting Information C02 Assessment Supporting Information Energy Statement Supporting Information Planning Statement Supporting Information Sustainable Drainage Assessment Supporting Information Transport Statement Supporting Information Additional Information APPEAL GUIDANCE: Should you (an applicant or agent) feel aggrieved by the decision of the Council to either refuse permission or to grant permission subject to conditions, you can

Policies cited
National Planning Policy Framework 12
D3
D4
CP30
CP31
DMD6
DMD8
DMD37
DMD44
NPPF
D6
CS4
DMD10
National Planning Policy Framework 9
D12
T4
T6
CS24
DMD45
DMD46
DMD47
Parties
Applicant
Mr Metin Susuz
Appeal
Appeal decided
Outcome: Appeal Dismissed
Timeline
18 Dec 2023
Application submitted
21 Dec 2023
Application validated
18 Mar 2024
Delegated decision: Refused
Appeal: Appeal decided
Supporting documents · 38
125 of 38
Decision Notice18 Mar 2024View ↗
REPORT18 Mar 2024View ↗
Press notice31 Jan 2024View ↗
Press notice31 Jan 2024View ↗
existing and proposed north west elevations4 Jan 2024View ↗
proposed garden plan and section4 Jan 2024View ↗
Planning Statement4 Jan 2024View ↗
Application Form - Without Personal Data18 Dec 2023View ↗
The location plan18 Dec 2023View ↗
EXISTING BLOCK PLAN OF THE SITE18 Dec 2023View ↗
FLOOR PLAN - EXISTING18 Dec 2023View ↗
ELEVATIONS - EXISTING18 Dec 2023View ↗
EXISTING AND PROPOSED SOUTH EAST ELEVATIONS18 Dec 2023View ↗
EXISTING AND PROPOSED NORTH-EAST ELEVATIONS18 Dec 2023View ↗
PROPOSED SITE PLAN AND LOFT PLANS18 Dec 2023View ↗
PROPOSED SITE PLAN AND ROOF PLAN18 Dec 2023View ↗
PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN AND MATERIALS.18 Dec 2023View ↗
EXISTING AND PROPOSED SOUTH-WEST ELEVATIONS18 Dec 2023View ↗
PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR PLAN18 Dec 2023View ↗
PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN18 Dec 2023View ↗
PROPOSED HOUSE 1 & 2 ELEVATIONS18 Dec 2023View ↗
PROPOSED HOUSE 3&4 ELEVATIONS18 Dec 2023View ↗
PROPOSED HOUSE 5 ELEVATIONS18 Dec 2023View ↗
PROPOSED HOUSE 1&2 FLOOR PLANS18 Dec 2023View ↗
PROPOSED HOUSE 3&4 FLOOR PLANS18 Dec 2023View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Enfield planning register.
Summary
Reference
23/04120/FUL
Type
Full
Applicant
Mr Metin Susuz
Submitted
18 Dec 2023
Decision date
18 Mar 2024
Council
Decision
Refused
Decision route
Delegated (officer)
How long, really
13
wks · this application
Submission → decision · 5 wks over the 8-week target
Public response
Objections
0
In support
0
Total comments
0