Development Intent
AtlasCroydonOfficersKarim Badawi
Case officer · Croydon Planning

Karim Badawi.

Last recorded decision Oct 2020 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Croydon with an approval rate of 50% across 11 decided planning applications, spanning 8 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer11 decisions50% approvalSave
Croydon · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
11
Applications
2020
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%50%202050%2021
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate50% · 73rd of 83
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Karim Badawi's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Karim Badawi decided — 8 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

DM30Car and cycle parking in developmentCroydon plan
5 times cited
DM10Design and characterCroydon plan
5 times cited
DM29Promoting sustainable travel and reducing congestionCroydon plan
4 times cited
SP6.4Croydon plan
4 times cited
SP4Urban Design, Heritage and Local CharacterCroydon plan
3 times cited
DM18Heritage assets and conservationCroydon plan
3 times cited
SP2.8Croydon plan
3 times cited
SP8Transport and CommunicationCroydon plan
2 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2020.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
20/05370/FUL
Full planning permission
Refused
2021-09-01
20/01550/FUL
Full planning permission
Approved
2021-03-12
20/05370/FUL
Full planning permission
Refused
2021-09-01
20/01550/FUL
Full planning permission
Approved
2021-03-12
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 11 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. CPMG Architects LTD
2. SED Associates
3. CANOPY PLANNING SERVICES LTD
4. David Ciccone Architects Limited
At a glance
OfficerKarim Badawi
BoroughCroydon
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications11 (2020)
Approval rate50%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Croydon planning register and published decision notices, 2020. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Croydon decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.