Development Intent
AtlasCroydonPolicyDM29
Planning AtlasCroydonDM29
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Croydon · Local Plan · Policy

DM29 — Promoting sustainable travel and reducing congestion.

How Croydon actually applies DM29: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

DM29 is a published Croydon planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Croydon Local Plan (adopted)

Croydon · DM29
Where DM29 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~36
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
345
times cited
in parsed decision notices
86%
appeal survival
278 dismissed · 47 allowed at appeal
45 of 67
officer reach
67% of officers recorded in this period
Purley And Woodcote
top hotspot ward
36 citations
What this policy is about

Policy DM29 promotes sustainable travel and reduces congestion in Croydon by requiring new developments to increase active travel, public transport use, and reduce private vehicle trips. The council will resist developments that severely impact local transport networks and support innovative solutions for last mile deliveries.

Plain-English summary of the adopted policy text below. The full text is the rule; this is the gist.

The policy — as adopted

Promoting sustainable travel and reducing congestion

To promote sustainable growth in Croydon and reduce the impact of traffic congestion development should: a. Create, enhance and promote measures to increase active travel, public transport use and reduce the need to make private vehicle trips; b. Have a positive effect on highway safety for pedestrians, cyclists, public transport users and private vehicles; c. Not result in a severe impact on the transport networks local to the site which would detract from the economic and environmental regeneration of the borough by making Croydon a less accessible and less attractive location in which to develop; d. Reduce the impacts of development in low PTAL areas (PTAL 2 and below) by integrating and providing for enhanced active travel measures within the development, subject to Table 10.1 Parking standards in development; e. Implement measures that support the Mayor of London’s Healthy Streets Approach, including the design of development; f. Ensure that the movement of pedestrians, cycles, public transport and emergency services are not impeded by deliveries and servicing requirements; and g. The impact of servicing and delivery requirements resulting from new development are expected to be minimised. How the policy works 10.29 All development has an impact on traffic movement in the borough. In order to reduce the impact on traffic movement the Council will require new development to promote measures to increase the use of public transport, cycling and walking. This includes ensuring new development has good access to public transport and has good links to main pedestrian and cycle routes in the borough. Other measures might include bike hire schemes, car clubs, other shared transport schemes, bus stop infrastructure, bus services, on demand transport services, cycle routes, cycle parking, public rights of way, footpaths, pedestrian facilities and crossings, tram stops and infrastructure. The design of new developments should prioritise walking and cycling routes into and through developments over routes for cars. Designs should also prioritise access to public transport over accessibility to private motor cars. 10.30 Some development would result in a severe impact on the local transport networks. Such development will not be permitted. Transport for London and Network Rail will be consulted on planning applications that could result in such an impact on the borough. Croydon Local Plan 2024 10.33 The extent of the local public transport network includes bus routes, tram routes and train stations. The exact extent of the local transport networks as well as other sustainable transport choices such as cycle and walking routes should be considered in any Transport Statement/Assessment. 10.34 The Strategic Policies require new developments to increase the permeability and connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists of their sites and to create new cycle routes in their developments. It is important that new routes are publicly accessible to enhance walking networks within the borough. 10.34A Servicing and deliveries contribute to the already high volumes of congestion in the borough. Additional growth within the borough is likely to further impact and as a result needs to be actively managed. Innovative solutions such as the implementation of last mile deliveries by foot, cycle or zero emission vehicles will be supported. Where appropriate, development is encouraged to identify opportunities for last mile logistics hubs. This is particularly important for high density residential or commercial developments in the Croydon Opportunity Area or town centres, that are forecast to generate significant servicing and delivery movements.

Verbatim from the adopted Croydon plan · source document. The council's published plan is the authoritative version.

How it lands
10% in approvals · 90% in refusals
345 citations in the selected period
The approval/refusal split is subscriber intelligenceUnlock →
Where it bites
Purley And Woodcote36
South Croydon34
Kenley22
What cites it — application types
all years on record · click a slice to filter
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue DM29 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

DM29 appears most often in Purley And Woodcote, South Croydon, Kenley. It appears across 45 of 67 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
10%
in approvals
36 citations
90%
in refusals
309 citations

This shows the decision reports in which DM29 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why DM29 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance
86% survival
278 dismissed · 47 allowed · 1 split326 PINS appeal decisions cite DM29

From Planning Inspectorate decision letters that cite DM29. Dismissed = the council's refusal stood, the policy held; allowed = overturned. The tighter join — this borough's own refusals citing DM29 traced to their specific appeals — is still to come.

Related — follow the thread
Croydon
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Croydon's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Croydon decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.