Development Intent
AtlasCroydonOfficersJoshua Ogunleye
Case officer · Croydon Planning

Joshua Ogunleye.

Recently active — last recorded decision Aug 2025

A case officer at Croydon with an approval rate of 73% across 13 decided planning applications, spanning 7 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer13 decisions73% approvalSave
Croydon · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
13
Applications
2024–25
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average

Not enough dated decisions for a trend yet.

What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate73% · 35th of 83
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Joshua Ogunleye's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Joshua Ogunleye decided — 5 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

DM29Promoting sustainable travel and reducing congestionCroydon plan
1 times cited
DM30Car and cycle parking in developmentCroydon plan
1 times cited
DM13Refuse and recyclingCroydon plan
1 times cited
T4London Plan
1 times cited
T5London Plan
1 times cited
6.1Superseded
1 times cited
SP2.8Croydon plan
1 times cited
DM10Design and characterCroydon plan
1 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2024–25.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
25/00005/FUL
Full planning permission
Approved
2025-12-03
25/01696/FUL
Full planning permission
Refused
2025-10-28
25/00005/FUL
Full planning permission
Approved
2025-12-03
25/01696/FUL
Full planning permission
Refused
2025-10-28
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 13 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Lewis and Co Planning SE Ltd
2. F Line Designs Ltd
3. Redwoods Projects
4. SR Engineering Services Limited
At a glance
OfficerJoshua Ogunleye
BoroughCroydon
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications13 (2024–25)
Approval rate73%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Croydon planning register and published decision notices, 2024–25. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Croydon decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.