Development Intent
AtlasCroydonCouncillorsJade_appleton
Planning AtlasCroydonJade Appleton
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Councillor · Park Hill & Whitgift, Croydon

Jade Appleton.

A Conservative member representing Park Hill & Whitgift in Croydon. 0% of the interventions we could place on the map fall inside Park Hill & Whitgift itself.

ConservativePark Hill & Whitgift ward
Croydon · Jade Appleton's interventions
Decisions — geocoded
ApprovedRefusedOther
⚠ Ward/map data below is built on councillor intervention records not yet through the doc-parser verification pass — treat as provisional.
⚠ “Committee sided/against” below is unverified — pending re-extraction of the officer-recommendation field.
At a glance · committee recordAll investigations →
9
Interventions
at committee
Meetings
attended
0%
In own ward
of resolved interventions
What they raise — by topicSubscriber
Height
3
Character
2
Bulk mass
2
Neighbour impact
1
Amenity space
1
Subscribe to see what Jade Appleton raises, by real topicSubscribe to unlock →
How they intervene — by type
Ward objection
3
Ward support
1

How Jade Appleton acts at committee, by type of intervention.

Intervention history

Where Jade Appleton moved, seconded, objected to, supported or voted on applications at committee, from the published minutes.

Intervention
Application
Committee
Date
Ward objection
Planning Sub-Committee
2022-11-17
Ward support
Planning Committee
2022-01-13
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2022-01-13
Planning Sub-Committee
2022-11-17
Ward objection
Planning Sub-Committee
2022-11-17
Ward support
Planning Committee
2022-01-13
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2022-01-13
Show all 4 rows
Planning Sub-Committee
2022-11-17
At a glance
PartyConservative
WardPark Hill & Whitgift
Planning committeeNo
CouncilCroydon
Committee appearances, interventions and votes from Croydon planning-committee minutes. “Committee sided” = voted in line with the officer recommendation. Councillor records are matched from the minutes across inconsistent name forms and are still being completed. The map above plots 9 of their 9 interventions (100%) that we could match to a specific application in our own scraped records — the rest reference applications outside that coverage (older cases, or a different borough's register) and aren't placeable yet. See political control and the committee.