Development Intent
Planning AtlasCamdenC1
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Camden · Local Plan · Policy

C1 — Health and wellbeing.

How Camden actually applies C1: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

C1 is a published Camden planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Camden Local Plan (adopted)

Camden · C1
Where C1 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~1
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
3
times cited
in parsed decision notices
57%
appeal survival
4 dismissed · 3 allowed at appeal
3 of 57
officer reach
5% of officers recorded in this period
Frognal & Fitzjohns
top hotspot ward
1 citations
What this policy is about

Policy C1 requires new developments to contribute to healthier communities by creating high-quality, safe, and accessible places. This includes incorporating measures to reduce health inequalities and conducting a Health Impact Assessment for major development schemes. The council will support the provision of new or improved health facilities and protect existing ones.

Plain-English summary of the adopted policy text below. The full text is the rule; this is the gist.

The policy — as adopted

Health and wellbeing

The Council will improve and promote strong, vibrant and healthy communities through ensuring a high quality environment with local services to support health, social and cultural wellbeing and reduce inequalities. Measures that will help contribute to healthier communities and reduce health inequalities must be incorporated in a development where appropriate. The Council will require: a. development to positively contribute to creating high quality, active, safe and accessible places; and b. proposals for major development schemes to include a Health Impact Assessment (HIA). We will: c. contribute towards the health priorities of the Health and Wellbeing Board and partners to help reduce health inequalities across the borough; d. support the provision of new or improved health facilities, in line with Camden’s Clinical Commissioning Group and NHS England requirements; and e. protect existing health facilities in line with Policy C2 Community facilities.

Verbatim from the adopted Camden plan · source document. The council's published plan is the authoritative version.

How it lands
100% in approvals · 0% in refusals
3 citations in the selected period
The approval/refusal split is subscriber intelligenceUnlock →
Where it bites
Frognal & Fitzjohns1
Highgate1
Belsize1
What cites it — application types
all years on record · click a slice to filter
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue C1 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

C1 appears most often in Frognal & Fitzjohns, Highgate, Belsize. It appears across 3 of 57 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
100%
in approvals
3 citations
0%
in refusals
0 citations

This shows the decision reports in which C1 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why C1 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance
57% survival
4 dismissed · 3 allowed7 PINS appeal decisions cite C1

From Planning Inspectorate decision letters that cite C1. Dismissed = the council's refusal stood, the policy held; allowed = overturned. The tighter join — this borough's own refusals citing C1 traced to their specific appeals — is still to come.

Related — follow the thread
Camden
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Camden's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Camden decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.