Ward · London Borough of Barking And Dagenham
Chadwell Heath.
Chadwell Heath sees an approval rate of 69% — 6 points above the Barking And Dagenham average across 421 substantive planning decisions, with a refusal rate of 31.3%.[1]
Barking And Dagenham421 applicationsSave
Chadwell Heath · Barking And Dagenham
Loading map…
421
Applications 2020–26
Decided applications
69%
Approval rate
6pp above borough avg (63%)
31.3%
Refusal rate
17th highest of 22
8.7
Avg decision time
Wks · borough avg 9.2
Data from publicly available Barking And Dagenham planning records and committee minutes, 2020–26.
Ward overview
Chadwell Heath recorded 421 substantive planning decisions over 2020–26, approving 69% of them — 6 percentage points above the Barking And Dagenham borough average of 63%. Its refusal rate of 31.3% is 17th highest of 22.
Application and refusal breakdown— subscriber data
Residential extension / alteration
New residential
Change of use
Commercial development
Recent planning decisions— subscriber data
Committee members for this ward
Councillor
Party
Role
Interventions
Success rate
Cllr Mark Williams
Labour
Planning committee
23
47%
Cllr Emma Torres
Labour
Ward member
6
33%
Cllr Mark Williams
Labour
Planning committee
23
47%
Cllr Emma Torres
Labour
Ward member
6
33%
Interventions: formal calls to bring an application before committee. Success rate: percentage where the committee sided with the councillor against officer recommendation.
Who decides here
At a glance[1]
WardChadwell Heath
CouncilBarking And Dagenham
Applications421 (2020–26)
Approval rate69%
Refusal rate31.3%
Decision time8.7 wks avg
Ward members2 (both Labour)
Planning constraints[2]
Conservation areas2
Article 4 directions2
Listed buildings17
TPO trees43
Flood zoneZone 1 (low)
Sources & method
- [1]Ward approval and refusal rates, application counts and decision-time figures — London Borough of Barking And Dagenham planning register and published decision notices, 2020–26. · methodology
- [2]Conservation areas, Article 4 directions and heritage designations — the borough’s adopted Local Plan and conservation-area appraisals.
- [3]Committee interventions and councillor records — public planning committee minutes and published decision notices.
- [4]Application-type mix and refusal grounds — case-officer reports coded against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.