Development Intent
Barking And Dagenham · Planning · Officers

Barking And Dagenham officers.

How Barking And Dagenham's planning officers actually decide. The 29 officers here settle most applications under delegation rather than at committee. Who they are, what they approve, and where they decide — click a name for their full record.

29 officers98% delegated
Barking And Dagenham · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glance · tap a metric for the investigation behind it
9
Active officers
of 29 on the record
98%
Decided delegated
vs 2% to committee
This borough’s committee
63%
Avg approval
borough-wide
Refusal Hotspots
Avg decision
not yet computed
Approval Clock
21%
Appeal overturn
London avg 26%
This borough’s appeals
How Barking And Dagenham's decisions split — by application type
Click a slice to isolate it
11,764
All development · decisions
69%
approval rate
Approval over time · all development
50%75%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
11,764decisions

Development decisions only — trees, advertisements and licences are excluded (see Applications that aren't development). Pick a type to reshade the map and recount.

The officer roster — Barking And Dagenham

Every officer deciding applications in the borough, 2020–26, ranked by volume. Click a name for their full record — where they decide, their approval rate and the consultants they work with.

Officer
Last active
Applications
Approval
Avg wks
Delegated
Cari Jones · Planning officer
Aug 2023
617
57%
7.1
Bethany Robins · Planning officer
Active
486
66%
7.7
Esther Rubinsohn · Planning officer
Active
457
61%
7.6
Cari Jones · Planning officer
Aug 2023
57%
More
617
7.1
Bethany Robins · Planning officer
Active
66%
More
486
7.7
Esther Rubinsohn · Planning officer
Active
61%
More
457
7.6
The full roster and per-officer trends are subscriber data.Subscribe to see all 29 officers →

Approval rate from Barking And Dagenham's published decision notices. Avg wks = median weeks from valid application to decision (20+ dated cases); Delegated = share decided under delegation (20+ levelled decisions). A dash means the register publishes too few dates or levels for that officer. Methodology →

Officers who move between boroughs

A decision-maker's habits travel with them. Officers move between authorities — once the cross-borough identity layer lands, you'll be able to follow the same officer across London and see whether their approval patterns hold. Compare against all London officers →