Development Intent
Planning AtlasBarking And DagenhamChadwell HeathApplication
Planning Application

26/00354/HSE

5 East Park Close, Chadwell Heath, Romford, Barking And Dagenham, RM6 6XX

HouseholderChadwell Heath ward
Submission
22 Mar 2026
Target
17 May 2026
Decision
15 May 2026
Outcome
Refused
Delegated decisionRefused
15 May 2026
Decided by Kate Brooks under delegated powers
Loading map…
Scheme description

Construction of front porch, a two storey side extension and a part single storey part two storey rear extension

Why it was refused
Reason 1

The proposed development, by reason of its excessive bulk, mass, scale, design and siting, would result in a disproportionate and overly large extension that fails to respect the proportions and character of the host dwelling. The combined porch, two storey side extension and part single, part two storey rear extensions would cumulatively overwhelm the original property, creating a footprint larger than the existing dwelling, amounting to a disproportionate overdevelopment of the site. The depth, width and wraparound form of the rear extensions, would disrupt the established pattern of modest rear projections, consistent building lines and clear visual breaks that characterise the terrace row, resulting in an incongruous form of development. The proposal also introduces a fragmented and visually discordant roofscape, including multiple differing roof forms which fails to reflect the coherent pitched and hipped roof profiles typical of the surrounding area. This would create a disjointed appearance when viewed from both the front and side elevations. As a result, the development would appear incongruous and out of keeping with the established character of the locality. The proposal is therefore contrary to: - National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) (MHCLG, December 2024) - Policies D1 and D4 of the London Plan (March 2021) - Policies SP2, DMD1, DMD5 of the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham’s Local Plan (September 2024) - The Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD (February 2012)

Reason 2

The proposed development, by reason of the depth, height and siting of the ground and first floor rear extensions would result in an unacceptable loss of daylight, increased overshadowing a loss of outlook and an overbearing sense of enclosure to No. 4 East Park Close. The first floor rear extension would further add to the massing resulting in a development that appears unduly dominant when viewed from No. 4. The proposal therefore fails to safeguard the amenity of neighbouring occupiers. This impact would be unacceptable and thus is contrary to: - National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) (MHCLG, December 2024) - Part D of policy D6 of the London Plan (March 2021) - Policies DMD1 of the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham’s Local Plan (September 2024) The above policies can be viewed on the Council's website: www.lbbd.gov.uk/planning.

Policies cited
D1
D4
SP2
DMD1
DMD5
NPPF
D6
Parties
Applicant
Mr Muhammad Arshad
Timeline
22 Mar 2026
Application submitted
15 May 2026
Delegated decision: Refused
Supporting documents · 13
BF Decision - FULL+HSE Refused12 May 2026View ↗
Officer Report11 May 2026View ↗
Existing Ground, First Floor and Roof Plans23 Mar 2026View ↗
Site Location Plan and Existing and Proposed Block Plans23 Mar 2026View ↗
Cover Letter23 Mar 2026View ↗
Planning Fire Safety Strategy23 Mar 2026View ↗
Existing and Proposed Section Plan23 Mar 2026View ↗
Proposed Front, Rear and Side Elevations23 Mar 2026View ↗
Proposed First Floor Plan23 Mar 2026View ↗
Proposed Roof Plan23 Mar 2026View ↗
Proposed Ground Floor Plan23 Mar 2026View ↗
Existing Front, Rear and Side Elevations23 Mar 2026View ↗
Application Form Redacted23 Mar 2026View ↗
View Application Page ↗
Data from the Barking And Dagenham planning register.
Summary
Reference
26/00354/HSE
Type
Householder Planning Permission
Applicant
Mr Muhammad Arshad
Submitted
22 Mar 2026
Decision date
15 May 2026
Decision
Refused
Decision route
How long, really
8
wks · this application
Submission → decision