Development Intent
InvestigationsCosts Paid
Planning AtlasInvestigationsCosts Paid
Public money — Free · London-wide

When councils lose and pay.

A planning appeal can generate two different bills: the council's own cost of defending it, and a costs award where unreasonable behaviour caused avoidable expense. Published sources reveal the scale; our borough table covers the smaller set of committee cases we could match to appeal decisions.

Awarded against London councils
£2.3m
Major schemes (2018–23, FOI sourced)

Awarded only for unreasonable behaviour (e.g. refusing against officer advice without substantiated reasons). PINS decides the award; the £ is assessed privately and never published — borough totals require FOI.

Matched committee cases with costs awards

15 committee-refusal cases matched to appeal decisions recording a costs award. This is not every London costs award.

1Croydon2
2Kensington & Chelsea2
3Hammersmith & Fulham2
4Sutton2
5Greenwich2
6Bromley1
7Westminster1
8Enfield1
9Tower Hamlets1
10Lewisham1
11Wandsworth0
12Harrow0
13Newham0
14Merton0
15Barnet0
+ 18 more
Related — follow the thread
Committee Watch
When committees overrule their planning officers
Open →
The Planning Inspectorate
Who overturns refusals, and how often
Open →
All investigations
The rest of the intelligence
Open →
Sources & method
The headline £ figure is the cited FOI total for London major schemes in 2018–23, not a sum of the borough rows. The borough rows count committee refusals in our published-minutes dataset that were matched to an appeal decision with a costs award. PINS records the award but not the privately assessed amount, so no £ value is inferred for an individual case.