Development Intent
Planning AtlasWandsworthLP36
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Wandsworth · Local Plan · Policy

LP36 — Railway Arches.

How Wandsworth actually applies LP36: who leans on it, where it bites hardest, and how often it's invoked. The policy text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

LP36 is a published Wandsworth planning policy. This page records where it appears in the council's published planning decisions.

Cited under: Wandsworth Local Plan (adopted)

Wandsworth · LP36
Where LP36 is quoted — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~1
Showing
re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
1
times cited
in parsed decision notices
appeal survival
no PINS appeal decisions cite it
1 of 67
officer reach
1% of officers recorded in this period
Shaftesbury & Queenstown
top hotspot ward
1 citations
What this policy is about

Policy LP36 protects existing uses in railway arches and supports new uses in certain locations. New uses will be supported in town and local centres, and areas with strategic industrial land, subject to certain conditions. In other locations, economic and community uses will be supported, but other uses require a 18-month marketing exercise to demonstrate no demand.

Plain-English summary of the adopted policy text below. The full text is the rule; this is the gist.

The policy — as adopted

Railway Arches

A. In order to maximise the contribution that railway arches, viaducts, and adjacent land, can make to the provision of industrial and other economic floorspace within the borough, existing uses will be protected and new uses supported in appropriate locations as follows: 1. The use of railway arches within town and local centres and the CAZ for town centre uses, community uses, and storage and distribution uses (B8) will be supported. Certain sui generis and/or industrial (B2 uses), such as microbreweries, will be supported in these locations, subject to it being demonstrated that they would not cause harm to the amenity of users of adjoining sites or the proper operation of neighbouring uses. 2. Within areas identified as providing for the borough’s strategic reservoir of industrial land, only industrial uses will be supported in accordance with Policy LP34. The use of planning conditions may be applied to permissions in order to protect the long-term industrial function of such sites. 3. Within the Wandle Delta sub-area, railway arches should be prioritised for economic uses; however other commercial uses will be acceptable where the policy requirements for the replacement or intensification of economic floorspace can be better accommodated elsewhere on the site, the approach is consistent with guidance set out in the relevant Site Allocation and/or SPD, and it can be demonstrated that town centre uses would not harm the vitality or vibrancy of designated centres or parades through the application of a sequential test. 4. The use of railways arches immediately adjacent to the New Covent Garden Market (NCGM) site will be required to support or complement the wholesale retail function of the market. The use of railway arches adjacent to the rest of the NCGM site should support the creation of the Food and Horticultural Quarter as set out in the Nine Elms Cultural Strategy and should reflect the connectivity and place-making role that these locations will perform. 5. In all other locations, the use of railway arches for economic and community uses will be supported. Applications for the change of use to other uses will not be supported, unless it can be clearly demonstrated that there is no demand for any economic or community use of the premises through the submission of evidence that a full and proper marketing exercise of the site has been undertaken for a period of at least 18 months in line with the requirements set out at Appendix 1 of this Plan. 6. Railway arches that provide for public access under the railway lines must maintain such access. The opening up of railway arches and surrounding land to facilitate new public access and improve permeability and place-making will be supported. B. Where a proposal involves the use of open and/or vacant railway arches, evidence will need to be submitted which demonstrates that any existing biodiversity value will not be harmed by the use or that appropriate mitigation measure will be provided in line with Policy LP55 (Biodiversity).

Verbatim from the adopted Wandsworth plan · source document. The council's published plan is the authoritative version.

How it lands
0% in approvals · 100% in refusals
1 citations in the selected period
The approval/refusal split is subscriber intelligenceUnlock →
Where it bites
Shaftesbury & Queenstown1
What cites it — application types
all years on record · click a slice to filter
What it means in practice

Not filled in yet. This will hold how officers actually argue LP36 case by case, classified from their decision reports — the classification pass hasn't run. Nothing is paraphrased in its place.

What the published record shows

LP36 appears most often in Shaftesbury & Queenstown. It appears across 1 of 67 officers recorded in this period. The map shows the pattern for the selected period.

Who cites it — case-officer spreadfrom parsed decision notices · click an officer
Who leans on this policy — and how often — is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Why it is cited — and what follows
0%
in approvals
0 citations
100%
in refusals
1 citations

This shows the decision reports in which LP36 appears. It does not yet claim that the policy caused those outcomes.

Reason · role · consequence

Not filled in yet — the classification pass over the citing passages hasn't run. When it has, this shows why LP36 was used, whether it supported approval or refusal, and what changed as a result. No conclusion is shown until that classification has been checked.

Why this policy is cited, and what follows, is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Does it hold up? — appeal performance

No Planning Inspectorate appeal decisions on record cite LP36. When one lands (the appeals table refreshes each weekday), the dismissed/allowed record appears here — never estimated.

Related — follow the thread
Wandsworth
Back to the borough policy record
Open →
Committee record
What reaches members, and what they do with it
Open →
Case officers
Wandsworth's decision-makers
Open →
Citations, officer spread, ward and application-type counts parsed from published Wandsworth decision notices (high-confidence parses, approvals and refusals), joined to the canonical application record. One citation = one decision citing the policy. See the policy overview for every policy cited.

Atlas intelligence summarises patterns and observations from published planning records. Past decisions do not indicate how any future application will be determined. Every application is assessed on its own merits, having regard to the proposal, site, evidence and policies applying at the time. This information is provided for general information only and is not planning, legal, financial or professional advice.