Development Intent
AtlasWandsworthOfficersThomas Wilson 7646
Case officer · Wandsworth Planning

Thomas Wilson 7646.

Last recorded decision Aug 2022 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Wandsworth with an approval rate of 96% across 169 decided planning applications, spanning 16 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer169 decisions96% approvalSave
Wandsworth · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
169
Applications
2020–22
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%98%202095%202197%2022
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate96% · 25th of 68
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Thomas Wilson 7646's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Thomas Wilson 7646 decided — 148 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

NPPFNPPF
42 times cited
DMS1SPD / guidance
36 times cited
4Wandsworth plan
17 times cited
DMS3SPD / guidance
16 times cited
2Wandsworth plan
12 times cited
DMS2SPD / guidance
5 times cited
1Wandsworth plan
3 times cited
9Wandsworth plan
3 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2020–22.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
2022/3307
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
2022-08
2022/2821
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
2022-08
2022/3307
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
2022-08
2022/2821
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
2022-08
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 169 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. The Planning Lab
2. Kier Construction Limited
3. Brookes Architects Ltd
4. Magenta Planning Limited
At a glance
OfficerThomas Wilson 7646
BoroughWandsworth
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications169 (2020–22)
Approval rate96%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Wandsworth planning register and published decision notices, 2020–22. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Wandsworth decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.