Development Intent
AtlasTower HamletsOfficersTanveer Rahman
Planning Atlas›Tower Hamlets›Tanveer Rahman
Case officer · Tower Hamlets Planning

Tanveer Rahman.

Recently active — last recorded decision Nov 2024

A case officer at Tower Hamlets with an approval rate of 72% across 155 decided planning applications, spanning 10 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer155 decisions72% approvalSave
Tower Hamlets · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
155
Applications
2020–24
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%71%202074%202178%202275%202363%2024100%2025
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compare — Versus peers
Approval rate72% · 61st of 76
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time— · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn— · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Tanveer Rahman's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Tanveer Rahman decided — 28 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

NPPFNPPF
8 times cited
S.DH3Heritage and the historic environmentTower Hamlets plan
8 times cited
D4London Plan
8 times cited
D.DH2Attractive streets, spaces and public realmTower Hamlets plan
7 times cited
7.6Superseded
6 times cited
D.DH8AmenityTower Hamlets plan
6 times cited
D3London Plan
6 times cited
D5London Plan
5 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
33
85%
33
100%
29
59%
17
71%
16
50%
8
75%
7
33%
6
50%
5
40%
1
100%
33
85%
33
100%
29
59%
Show all 10 rows
17
71%
16
50%
8
75%
7
33%
6
50%
5
40%
1
100%

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2020–24.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
PA/24/00594/A1
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2025-01-30
PA/24/01191/NC
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2025-01-09
PA/24/00594/A1
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2025-01-30
PA/24/01191/NC
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2025-01-09
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 155 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. CVB
2. Stace LLP
3. Everard Construction Manegament Ltd
4. Planning Potential Ltd.
At a glance
OfficerTanveer Rahman
RolePlanning officer
Experience—
Applications155 (2020–24)
Approval rate72%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Tower Hamlets planning register and published decision notices, 2020–24. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Tower Hamlets decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.